YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Economic Viability of Canal Flow

    Source: Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2018:;Volume ( 144 ):;issue: 008
    Author:
    Swamee Prabhata K.;Rathie Pushpa N.;Chahar Bhagu R.
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001327
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: If the flow in a pipeline is maintained by creating a pressure head by pumping, it is called a pumping main. On the other hand, the flow in a canal is maintained through an elevation difference. Being gravity sustained, open-channel flow is preferred in comparison to pipe flow that is sustained by pumping. Furthermore, in the absence of moving parts, open-channel flow has greater reliability. For a gently sloping topography, the gravitational system involves large canal sections. In comparison to a pumping main such a small sloped canal may be uneconomical. A review of the literature has indicated that there is no guideline available for adoption of a canal for such a flat terrain. In this investigation, the optimal cost function of pumping main has been compared with the cost of various canal section shapes to find a criterion for adoption of canal flow.
    • Download: (165.5Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Economic Viability of Canal Flow

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4249645
    Collections
    • Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorSwamee Prabhata K.;Rathie Pushpa N.;Chahar Bhagu R.
    date accessioned2019-02-26T07:49:25Z
    date available2019-02-26T07:49:25Z
    date issued2018
    identifier other%28ASCE%29IR.1943-4774.0001327.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4249645
    description abstractIf the flow in a pipeline is maintained by creating a pressure head by pumping, it is called a pumping main. On the other hand, the flow in a canal is maintained through an elevation difference. Being gravity sustained, open-channel flow is preferred in comparison to pipe flow that is sustained by pumping. Furthermore, in the absence of moving parts, open-channel flow has greater reliability. For a gently sloping topography, the gravitational system involves large canal sections. In comparison to a pumping main such a small sloped canal may be uneconomical. A review of the literature has indicated that there is no guideline available for adoption of a canal for such a flat terrain. In this investigation, the optimal cost function of pumping main has been compared with the cost of various canal section shapes to find a criterion for adoption of canal flow.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleEconomic Viability of Canal Flow
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume144
    journal issue8
    journal titleJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001327
    page6018003
    treeJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2018:;Volume ( 144 ):;issue: 008
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian