Show simple item record

contributor authorSwamee Prabhata K.;Rathie Pushpa N.;Chahar Bhagu R.
date accessioned2019-02-26T07:49:25Z
date available2019-02-26T07:49:25Z
date issued2018
identifier other%28ASCE%29IR.1943-4774.0001327.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4249645
description abstractIf the flow in a pipeline is maintained by creating a pressure head by pumping, it is called a pumping main. On the other hand, the flow in a canal is maintained through an elevation difference. Being gravity sustained, open-channel flow is preferred in comparison to pipe flow that is sustained by pumping. Furthermore, in the absence of moving parts, open-channel flow has greater reliability. For a gently sloping topography, the gravitational system involves large canal sections. In comparison to a pumping main such a small sloped canal may be uneconomical. A review of the literature has indicated that there is no guideline available for adoption of a canal for such a flat terrain. In this investigation, the optimal cost function of pumping main has been compared with the cost of various canal section shapes to find a criterion for adoption of canal flow.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleEconomic Viability of Canal Flow
typeJournal Paper
journal volume144
journal issue8
journal titleJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001327
page6018003
treeJournal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering:;2018:;Volume ( 144 ):;issue: 008
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record