YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Design and Construction Practice
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Structural Design and Construction Practice
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Untitled

    Source: Practice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction:;2018:;Volume ( 023 ):;issue: Safety and Economy in the Design of Reinforced and Post-tensioned Slab Systems Using IS, BS, and ACI Standards;3
    Author:
    Jayalakshmi Satyanarayanan Arvind;Santhi Mariadhas Helen;Dhanapalan Prabu
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000360
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: An office floor with a typical grid size of 1.8 × 8 m in a multistory building was considered for design with flat-slab, flat-plate, and beam-slab systems. In all cases, both RC and post-tensioned systems were used for the comparison of structural performance and cost together with safety. The slab systems were designed using three different codes of practice: Indian Standard (IS), British Standard (BS), and American Concrete Institute (ACI) standards. From the cost analysis, it is observed that the post-tensioned flat-slab system provides better cost reduction of approximately 16.5 and 2% in the case of IS and BS standards, respectively. In the case of ACI standards, the RC and post-tensioned flat-slab systems yield 17.7 and 12.5% cost reduction, respectively. From the study, it was concluded that the post-tensioned flat-slab system using ACI standards is considered to be durable because the tensile stress is restricted and designed as an uncracked section, whereas the IS and BS allow .2-mm crack width.
    • Download: (3.344Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4248197
    Collections
    • Journal of Structural Design and Construction Practice

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJayalakshmi Satyanarayanan Arvind;Santhi Mariadhas Helen;Dhanapalan Prabu
    date accessioned2019-02-26T07:36:16Z
    date available2019-02-26T07:36:16Z
    date issued2018
    identifier other%28ASCE%29SC.1943-5576.0000360.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4248197
    description abstractAn office floor with a typical grid size of 1.8 × 8 m in a multistory building was considered for design with flat-slab, flat-plate, and beam-slab systems. In all cases, both RC and post-tensioned systems were used for the comparison of structural performance and cost together with safety. The slab systems were designed using three different codes of practice: Indian Standard (IS), British Standard (BS), and American Concrete Institute (ACI) standards. From the cost analysis, it is observed that the post-tensioned flat-slab system provides better cost reduction of approximately 16.5 and 2% in the case of IS and BS standards, respectively. In the case of ACI standards, the RC and post-tensioned flat-slab systems yield 17.7 and 12.5% cost reduction, respectively. From the study, it was concluded that the post-tensioned flat-slab system using ACI standards is considered to be durable because the tensile stress is restricted and designed as an uncracked section, whereas the IS and BS allow .2-mm crack width.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume23
    journal titlePractice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000360
    page4018010
    treePractice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction:;2018:;Volume ( 023 ):;issue: Safety and Economy in the Design of Reinforced and Post-tensioned Slab Systems Using IS, BS, and ACI Standards;3
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian