Show simple item record

contributor authorJayalakshmi Satyanarayanan Arvind;Santhi Mariadhas Helen;Dhanapalan Prabu
date accessioned2019-02-26T07:36:16Z
date available2019-02-26T07:36:16Z
date issued2018
identifier other%28ASCE%29SC.1943-5576.0000360.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4248197
description abstractAn office floor with a typical grid size of 1.8 × 8 m in a multistory building was considered for design with flat-slab, flat-plate, and beam-slab systems. In all cases, both RC and post-tensioned systems were used for the comparison of structural performance and cost together with safety. The slab systems were designed using three different codes of practice: Indian Standard (IS), British Standard (BS), and American Concrete Institute (ACI) standards. From the cost analysis, it is observed that the post-tensioned flat-slab system provides better cost reduction of approximately 16.5 and 2% in the case of IS and BS standards, respectively. In the case of ACI standards, the RC and post-tensioned flat-slab systems yield 17.7 and 12.5% cost reduction, respectively. From the study, it was concluded that the post-tensioned flat-slab system using ACI standards is considered to be durable because the tensile stress is restricted and designed as an uncracked section, whereas the IS and BS allow .2-mm crack width.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
typeJournal Paper
journal volume23
journal titlePractice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943-5576.0000360
page4018010
treePractice Periodical on Structural Design and Construction:;2018:;Volume ( 023 ):;issue: Safety and Economy in the Design of Reinforced and Post-tensioned Slab Systems Using IS, BS, and ACI Standards;3
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record