YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Comparison of Methods for Yield Assessment of Multiple Reservoir Systems

    Source: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;1997:;Volume ( 123 ):;issue: 006
    Author:
    G. C. Dandy
    ,
    M. C. Connarty
    ,
    D. P. Loucks
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1997)123:6(350)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: This paper compares four different methods for estimating the yield of a multiple reservoir system. These include simulation, a combined simulation-optimization model (WATHNET), a full optimization model, and a simplified optimization model called the yield model. Simulation is used widely in practice and provides a good approximation of the behavior of the system but requires a set of operating rules to be specified. The optimization methods automatically determine operating rules and are therefore quite useful in estimating the yield of a new system that has not yet been operated. The four methods are used to estimate the safe historical yield of the Canberra water supply system (Australia). It was found that the full optimization model and the yield model provide high estimates of the system yield because they assume perfect knowledge of future inflows. WATHNET presents a reasonable compromise in estimating the system yield using implied operating rules that are achievable in practice.
    • Download: (1.028Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Comparison of Methods for Yield Assessment of Multiple Reservoir Systems

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/39504
    Collections
    • Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management

    Show full item record

    contributor authorG. C. Dandy
    contributor authorM. C. Connarty
    contributor authorD. P. Loucks
    date accessioned2017-05-08T21:07:23Z
    date available2017-05-08T21:07:23Z
    date copyrightNovember 1997
    date issued1997
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9496%281997%29123%3A6%28350%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/39504
    description abstractThis paper compares four different methods for estimating the yield of a multiple reservoir system. These include simulation, a combined simulation-optimization model (WATHNET), a full optimization model, and a simplified optimization model called the yield model. Simulation is used widely in practice and provides a good approximation of the behavior of the system but requires a set of operating rules to be specified. The optimization methods automatically determine operating rules and are therefore quite useful in estimating the yield of a new system that has not yet been operated. The four methods are used to estimate the safe historical yield of the Canberra water supply system (Australia). It was found that the full optimization model and the yield model provide high estimates of the system yield because they assume perfect knowledge of future inflows. WATHNET presents a reasonable compromise in estimating the system yield using implied operating rules that are achievable in practice.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleComparison of Methods for Yield Assessment of Multiple Reservoir Systems
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume123
    journal issue6
    journal titleJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1997)123:6(350)
    treeJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;1997:;Volume ( 123 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian