Show simple item record

contributor authorG. C. Dandy
contributor authorM. C. Connarty
contributor authorD. P. Loucks
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:07:23Z
date available2017-05-08T21:07:23Z
date copyrightNovember 1997
date issued1997
identifier other%28asce%290733-9496%281997%29123%3A6%28350%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/39504
description abstractThis paper compares four different methods for estimating the yield of a multiple reservoir system. These include simulation, a combined simulation-optimization model (WATHNET), a full optimization model, and a simplified optimization model called the yield model. Simulation is used widely in practice and provides a good approximation of the behavior of the system but requires a set of operating rules to be specified. The optimization methods automatically determine operating rules and are therefore quite useful in estimating the yield of a new system that has not yet been operated. The four methods are used to estimate the safe historical yield of the Canberra water supply system (Australia). It was found that the full optimization model and the yield model provide high estimates of the system yield because they assume perfect knowledge of future inflows. WATHNET presents a reasonable compromise in estimating the system yield using implied operating rules that are achievable in practice.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleComparison of Methods for Yield Assessment of Multiple Reservoir Systems
typeJournal Paper
journal volume123
journal issue6
journal titleJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(1997)123:6(350)
treeJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management:;1997:;Volume ( 123 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record