Soft-Systems Methodology as Learning and Management ToolSource: Journal of Urban Planning and Development:;1995:;Volume ( 121 ):;issue: 003Author:C. Jotin Khisty
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(1995)121:3(91)Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Abstract: It has long been recognized that urban systems are a subset of human activity systems, where decision making entails dealing not only with planning and engineering elements but also with political and social entities. The latter two entities have been neglected in the past, because engineers and planners have drawn heavily from the methods and practice of operations research, systems engineering, and the power of quantitative methods to “solve” practically all urban-planning–related problems. The overall results of the use of these “hard systems” methodologies (HSM) have not been uniformly successful, except in dealing with the simpler cases. In this paper the “soft systems” methodology (SSM) is explained in detail, showing how it can be applied to problems concerned with rational intervention in human activity systems. SSM is an inquiring system used for tackling ill-structured, messy problem situations in engineering and planning. In practice, HSM and SSM complement and supplement each other. An example applied to a transportation planning situation is included. This methodology has proven to be effective and easy to use.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | C. Jotin Khisty | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:05:31Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T21:05:31Z | |
| date copyright | September 1995 | |
| date issued | 1995 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%290733-9488%281995%29121%3A3%2891%29.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/38322 | |
| description abstract | It has long been recognized that urban systems are a subset of human activity systems, where decision making entails dealing not only with planning and engineering elements but also with political and social entities. The latter two entities have been neglected in the past, because engineers and planners have drawn heavily from the methods and practice of operations research, systems engineering, and the power of quantitative methods to “solve” practically all urban-planning–related problems. The overall results of the use of these “hard systems” methodologies (HSM) have not been uniformly successful, except in dealing with the simpler cases. In this paper the “soft systems” methodology (SSM) is explained in detail, showing how it can be applied to problems concerned with rational intervention in human activity systems. SSM is an inquiring system used for tackling ill-structured, messy problem situations in engineering and planning. In practice, HSM and SSM complement and supplement each other. An example applied to a transportation planning situation is included. This methodology has proven to be effective and easy to use. | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Soft-Systems Methodology as Learning and Management Tool | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 121 | |
| journal issue | 3 | |
| journal title | Journal of Urban Planning and Development | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(1995)121:3(91) | |
| tree | Journal of Urban Planning and Development:;1995:;Volume ( 121 ):;issue: 003 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |