Show simple item record

contributor authorC. Jotin Khisty
date accessioned2017-05-08T21:05:31Z
date available2017-05-08T21:05:31Z
date copyrightSeptember 1995
date issued1995
identifier other%28asce%290733-9488%281995%29121%3A3%2891%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/38322
description abstractIt has long been recognized that urban systems are a subset of human activity systems, where decision making entails dealing not only with planning and engineering elements but also with political and social entities. The latter two entities have been neglected in the past, because engineers and planners have drawn heavily from the methods and practice of operations research, systems engineering, and the power of quantitative methods to “solve” practically all urban-planning–related problems. The overall results of the use of these “hard systems” methodologies (HSM) have not been uniformly successful, except in dealing with the simpler cases. In this paper the “soft systems” methodology (SSM) is explained in detail, showing how it can be applied to problems concerned with rational intervention in human activity systems. SSM is an inquiring system used for tackling ill-structured, messy problem situations in engineering and planning. In practice, HSM and SSM complement and supplement each other. An example applied to a transportation planning situation is included. This methodology has proven to be effective and easy to use.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleSoft-Systems Methodology as Learning and Management Tool
typeJournal Paper
journal volume121
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Urban Planning and Development
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(1995)121:3(91)
treeJournal of Urban Planning and Development:;1995:;Volume ( 121 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record