Behavior of Harp Bracings in Rigid Frame Metallic BaysSource: Journal of Structural Engineering:;2005:;Volume ( 131 ):;issue: 009Author:Jesús Montero Martínez
,
Pablo Galletero Montero
,
Carlos Neumeister Peguero
,
Fausto Díaz de Prado
DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:9(1397)Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
Abstract: Simple two-dimensional frames are normally used when building bays. These frames are placed in series and held longitudinally with bracings. These two directions, transversal and longitudinal, are independent of each other. Thus, the transverse frame bears loads in its plane with no help from the longitudinal bracings. In the case of transverse rigid frames, with the typology described, the columns act as bending brackets, requiring large-size columns and large foundations. Against the traditional typology, an alternative can be the usage of special on-roof bracings called “harp bracings.” With these harp bracings, the loads received by the columns are partially transmitted to the endwall frame. In this way, the columns tend to behave as encastered-supported elements, which require smaller section size and foundations. This paper presents a comparative study between rigid frames, solved with traditional bracings, and harp bracings. Spans from
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Jesús Montero Martínez | |
| contributor author | Pablo Galletero Montero | |
| contributor author | Carlos Neumeister Peguero | |
| contributor author | Fausto Díaz de Prado | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-08T20:59:33Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-08T20:59:33Z | |
| date copyright | September 2005 | |
| date issued | 2005 | |
| identifier other | %28asce%290733-9445%282005%29131%3A9%281397%29.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/34623 | |
| description abstract | Simple two-dimensional frames are normally used when building bays. These frames are placed in series and held longitudinally with bracings. These two directions, transversal and longitudinal, are independent of each other. Thus, the transverse frame bears loads in its plane with no help from the longitudinal bracings. In the case of transverse rigid frames, with the typology described, the columns act as bending brackets, requiring large-size columns and large foundations. Against the traditional typology, an alternative can be the usage of special on-roof bracings called “harp bracings.” With these harp bracings, the loads received by the columns are partially transmitted to the endwall frame. In this way, the columns tend to behave as encastered-supported elements, which require smaller section size and foundations. This paper presents a comparative study between rigid frames, solved with traditional bracings, and harp bracings. Spans from | |
| publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| title | Behavior of Harp Bracings in Rigid Frame Metallic Bays | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 131 | |
| journal issue | 9 | |
| journal title | Journal of Structural Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:9(1397) | |
| tree | Journal of Structural Engineering:;2005:;Volume ( 131 ):;issue: 009 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |