Show simple item record

contributor authorJesús Montero Martínez
contributor authorPablo Galletero Montero
contributor authorCarlos Neumeister Peguero
contributor authorFausto Díaz de Prado
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:59:33Z
date available2017-05-08T20:59:33Z
date copyrightSeptember 2005
date issued2005
identifier other%28asce%290733-9445%282005%29131%3A9%281397%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/34623
description abstractSimple two-dimensional frames are normally used when building bays. These frames are placed in series and held longitudinally with bracings. These two directions, transversal and longitudinal, are independent of each other. Thus, the transverse frame bears loads in its plane with no help from the longitudinal bracings. In the case of transverse rigid frames, with the typology described, the columns act as bending brackets, requiring large-size columns and large foundations. Against the traditional typology, an alternative can be the usage of special on-roof bracings called “harp bracings.” With these harp bracings, the loads received by the columns are partially transmitted to the endwall frame. In this way, the columns tend to behave as encastered-supported elements, which require smaller section size and foundations. This paper presents a comparative study between rigid frames, solved with traditional bracings, and harp bracings. Spans from
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleBehavior of Harp Bracings in Rigid Frame Metallic Bays
typeJournal Paper
journal volume131
journal issue9
journal titleJournal of Structural Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2005)131:9(1397)
treeJournal of Structural Engineering:;2005:;Volume ( 131 ):;issue: 009
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record