YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Construction of Rubber‐Modified Asphalt Pavements

    Source: Journal of Construction Engineering and Management:;1987:;Volume ( 113 ):;issue: 004
    Author:
    Jay L. McQuillen, Jr.
    ,
    R. Gary Hicks
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1987)113:4(537)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Public road agencies are currently evaluating hot mix applications of PlusRide™ and Arm‐R‐Shield™ modified asphalt pavements. The processes use reclaimed rubber from ground automotive and light truck tires to reduce reflective and thermal cracking, suppress traffic noise, increase resistance to studded tire wear, and reduce the environmental impact of tire disposal. The projects constructed to date have primarily been experimental because the capital cost for this surfacing alternative ranges from 1.5 to 2 or more times the cost of conventional asphaltic concrete. A literature review of the construction practices and a questionnaire survey of contractors are used to determine why the construction costs of the modified mixes have been so high. One of the factors is the increase in financial risk perceived by contractors who bid on these types of pavements. Another cost factor, especially with the PlusRide™ system, is the unusual aggregate gradation required by the process. Still another concern is the increased mixing temperatures and times required by both rubber‐modified products. For Arm‐R‐Shield™, the high cost of the mix primarily reflects the cost of the asphalt‐rubber binder supplied by the manufacturer. These costs could be reduced by development of specifications which limit the contractor's risk, such as the use of conventional aggregate gradings, requiring minimum increases in mixing temperature and time, and allowing competition between rubber‐modified asphalt suppliers.
    • Download: (989.4Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Construction of Rubber‐Modified Asphalt Pavements

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/33286
    Collections
    • Journal of Construction Engineering and Management

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJay L. McQuillen, Jr.
    contributor authorR. Gary Hicks
    date accessioned2017-05-08T20:57:31Z
    date available2017-05-08T20:57:31Z
    date copyrightDecember 1987
    date issued1987
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9364%281987%29113%3A4%28537%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/33286
    description abstractPublic road agencies are currently evaluating hot mix applications of PlusRide™ and Arm‐R‐Shield™ modified asphalt pavements. The processes use reclaimed rubber from ground automotive and light truck tires to reduce reflective and thermal cracking, suppress traffic noise, increase resistance to studded tire wear, and reduce the environmental impact of tire disposal. The projects constructed to date have primarily been experimental because the capital cost for this surfacing alternative ranges from 1.5 to 2 or more times the cost of conventional asphaltic concrete. A literature review of the construction practices and a questionnaire survey of contractors are used to determine why the construction costs of the modified mixes have been so high. One of the factors is the increase in financial risk perceived by contractors who bid on these types of pavements. Another cost factor, especially with the PlusRide™ system, is the unusual aggregate gradation required by the process. Still another concern is the increased mixing temperatures and times required by both rubber‐modified products. For Arm‐R‐Shield™, the high cost of the mix primarily reflects the cost of the asphalt‐rubber binder supplied by the manufacturer. These costs could be reduced by development of specifications which limit the contractor's risk, such as the use of conventional aggregate gradings, requiring minimum increases in mixing temperature and time, and allowing competition between rubber‐modified asphalt suppliers.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleConstruction of Rubber‐Modified Asphalt Pavements
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume113
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1987)113:4(537)
    treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;1987:;Volume ( 113 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian