Show simple item record

contributor authorJay L. McQuillen, Jr.
contributor authorR. Gary Hicks
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:57:31Z
date available2017-05-08T20:57:31Z
date copyrightDecember 1987
date issued1987
identifier other%28asce%290733-9364%281987%29113%3A4%28537%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/33286
description abstractPublic road agencies are currently evaluating hot mix applications of PlusRide™ and Arm‐R‐Shield™ modified asphalt pavements. The processes use reclaimed rubber from ground automotive and light truck tires to reduce reflective and thermal cracking, suppress traffic noise, increase resistance to studded tire wear, and reduce the environmental impact of tire disposal. The projects constructed to date have primarily been experimental because the capital cost for this surfacing alternative ranges from 1.5 to 2 or more times the cost of conventional asphaltic concrete. A literature review of the construction practices and a questionnaire survey of contractors are used to determine why the construction costs of the modified mixes have been so high. One of the factors is the increase in financial risk perceived by contractors who bid on these types of pavements. Another cost factor, especially with the PlusRide™ system, is the unusual aggregate gradation required by the process. Still another concern is the increased mixing temperatures and times required by both rubber‐modified products. For Arm‐R‐Shield™, the high cost of the mix primarily reflects the cost of the asphalt‐rubber binder supplied by the manufacturer. These costs could be reduced by development of specifications which limit the contractor's risk, such as the use of conventional aggregate gradings, requiring minimum increases in mixing temperature and time, and allowing competition between rubber‐modified asphalt suppliers.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleConstruction of Rubber‐Modified Asphalt Pavements
typeJournal Paper
journal volume113
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Construction Engineering and Management
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(1987)113:4(537)
treeJournal of Construction Engineering and Management:;1987:;Volume ( 113 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record