YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Relative Compaction of Fill Having Oversize Particles

    Source: Journal of Geotechnical Engineering:;1989:;Volume ( 115 ):;issue: 010
    Author:
    Robert W. Day
    DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1989)115:10(1487)
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Three methods used to determine the relative compaction of fill having oversize particles are compared. For the purpose of this study, oversize particles are defined as rock that is retained on the 3/4-in. (19-mm) sieve, while the soil matrix is the material passing the 3/4-in. (19-mm) sieve. The three methods are the elimination method, adjusted maximum dry density method, and the substitution method. The three methods did not give the same results for the tested soil. Assuming a fill that must be compacted to 90% relative compaction, the elimination method would require the highest field dry density, while the adjusted maximum dry density method would require the lowest field dry density. For fill that contains large amounts of oversize particles, the adjusted maximum dry density method should be used with caution, since this method can result in low dry density values of the soil matrix.
    • Download: (273.2Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Relative Compaction of Fill Having Oversize Particles

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/20369
    Collections
    • Journal of Geotechnical Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorRobert W. Day
    date accessioned2017-05-08T20:35:11Z
    date available2017-05-08T20:35:11Z
    date copyrightOctober 1989
    date issued1989
    identifier other%28asce%290733-9410%281989%29115%3A10%281487%29.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/20369
    description abstractThree methods used to determine the relative compaction of fill having oversize particles are compared. For the purpose of this study, oversize particles are defined as rock that is retained on the 3/4-in. (19-mm) sieve, while the soil matrix is the material passing the 3/4-in. (19-mm) sieve. The three methods are the elimination method, adjusted maximum dry density method, and the substitution method. The three methods did not give the same results for the tested soil. Assuming a fill that must be compacted to 90% relative compaction, the elimination method would require the highest field dry density, while the adjusted maximum dry density method would require the lowest field dry density. For fill that contains large amounts of oversize particles, the adjusted maximum dry density method should be used with caution, since this method can result in low dry density values of the soil matrix.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleRelative Compaction of Fill Having Oversize Particles
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume115
    journal issue10
    journal titleJournal of Geotechnical Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1989)115:10(1487)
    treeJournal of Geotechnical Engineering:;1989:;Volume ( 115 ):;issue: 010
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian