Show simple item record

contributor authorRobert W. Day
date accessioned2017-05-08T20:35:11Z
date available2017-05-08T20:35:11Z
date copyrightOctober 1989
date issued1989
identifier other%28asce%290733-9410%281989%29115%3A10%281487%29.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/20369
description abstractThree methods used to determine the relative compaction of fill having oversize particles are compared. For the purpose of this study, oversize particles are defined as rock that is retained on the 3/4-in. (19-mm) sieve, while the soil matrix is the material passing the 3/4-in. (19-mm) sieve. The three methods are the elimination method, adjusted maximum dry density method, and the substitution method. The three methods did not give the same results for the tested soil. Assuming a fill that must be compacted to 90% relative compaction, the elimination method would require the highest field dry density, while the adjusted maximum dry density method would require the lowest field dry density. For fill that contains large amounts of oversize particles, the adjusted maximum dry density method should be used with caution, since this method can result in low dry density values of the soil matrix.
publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
titleRelative Compaction of Fill Having Oversize Particles
typeJournal Paper
journal volume115
journal issue10
journal titleJournal of Geotechnical Engineering
identifier doi10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1989)115:10(1487)
treeJournal of Geotechnical Engineering:;1989:;Volume ( 115 ):;issue: 010
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record