YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    The Future Roles for Tracked Levitated Vehicle Systems

    Source: Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control:;1974:;volume( 096 ):;issue: 002::page 117
    Author:
    J. D. Ward
    DOI: 10.1115/1.3426783
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: The future roles for tracked levitated vehicle (TLV) systems are identified in the context of comparison with improved passenger rail systems and short haul air systems. These new TLV systems, anticipated to be available for operational use in the 1980’s, will be capable of cruise speeds to about 300 mph, compared to 150–170 mph for high speed rail. The paper concludes that, when developed, TLV will be better than the best rail. Because of its higher speed, travel times will be shorter and operational costs per seat mile will be lower. Higher speed results in lower operating costs because it increases vehicle productivity in terms of seat-miles generated per hour. The relative preference between TLV and air systems depends on both ridership density and trip distance. TLV has much higher fixed costs than air because of the large investment in guideway and other infrastructure, so that TLV requires a larger ridership if fixed costs per passenger are to be reasonable. In operations, however, air systems lose much more time in terminal (airport) stops than TLV systems, which penalizes total trip time and vehicle productivity, especially for short trip distances. Thus air system operating costs are substantially higher than those of TLV systems for short trips. The net result is a general preference for TLV systems when ridership densities are high and trip distances are below 300–400 miles, and a preference for air systems at lower ridership densities or for longer trips. Air is distinctly superior beyond 500 miles.
    keyword(s): Vehicles , Rails , Travel , High speed rail AND Density ,
    • Download: (1.462Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      The Future Roles for Tracked Levitated Vehicle Systems

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/164644
    Collections
    • Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJ. D. Ward
    date accessioned2017-05-09T01:37:54Z
    date available2017-05-09T01:37:54Z
    date copyrightJune, 1974
    date issued1974
    identifier issn0022-0434
    identifier otherJDSMAA-26014#117_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/164644
    description abstractThe future roles for tracked levitated vehicle (TLV) systems are identified in the context of comparison with improved passenger rail systems and short haul air systems. These new TLV systems, anticipated to be available for operational use in the 1980’s, will be capable of cruise speeds to about 300 mph, compared to 150–170 mph for high speed rail. The paper concludes that, when developed, TLV will be better than the best rail. Because of its higher speed, travel times will be shorter and operational costs per seat mile will be lower. Higher speed results in lower operating costs because it increases vehicle productivity in terms of seat-miles generated per hour. The relative preference between TLV and air systems depends on both ridership density and trip distance. TLV has much higher fixed costs than air because of the large investment in guideway and other infrastructure, so that TLV requires a larger ridership if fixed costs per passenger are to be reasonable. In operations, however, air systems lose much more time in terminal (airport) stops than TLV systems, which penalizes total trip time and vehicle productivity, especially for short trip distances. Thus air system operating costs are substantially higher than those of TLV systems for short trips. The net result is a general preference for TLV systems when ridership densities are high and trip distances are below 300–400 miles, and a preference for air systems at lower ridership densities or for longer trips. Air is distinctly superior beyond 500 miles.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleThe Future Roles for Tracked Levitated Vehicle Systems
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume96
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control
    identifier doi10.1115/1.3426783
    journal fristpage117
    journal lastpage127
    identifier eissn1528-9028
    keywordsVehicles
    keywordsRails
    keywordsTravel
    keywordsHigh speed rail AND Density
    treeJournal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control:;1974:;volume( 096 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian