Wind Climate Parameters for Wind Turbine Fatigue Load AssessmentSource: Journal of Solar Energy Engineering:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 003::page 31010Author:Stensgaard Toft, Henrik
,
Svenningsen, Lasse
,
Moser, Wolfgang
,
Dalsgaard Sأ¸rensen, John
,
Lybech Thأ¸gersen, Morten
DOI: 10.1115/1.4033111Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: Sitespecific assessment of wind turbine design requires verification that the individual wind turbine components can survive the sitespecific wind climate. The wind turbine design standard, IEC 614001 (third edition), describes how this should be done using a simplified, equivalent wind climate established from the onsite distribution functions of the horizontal mean wind speeds, the 90% quantile of turbulence along with average values of vertical wind shear and air density and the maximum flow inclination. This paper investigates the accuracy of fatigue loads estimated using this equivalent wind climate required by the current design standard by comparing damage equivalent fatigue loads estimated based on wind climate parameters for each 10 min timeseries with fatigue loads estimated based on the equivalent wind climate parameters. Wind measurements from Boulder, CO, in the United States and Hأ¸vsأ¸re in Denmark have been used to estimate the natural variation in the wind conditions between 10 min time periods. The structural wind turbine loads have been simulated using the aeroelastic model FAST. The results show that using a 90% quantile for the turbulence leads to an accurate assessment of the blade root flapwise bending moment and a conservative assessment of the tower bottom foraft bending moment and low speed shaft torque. Currently, IEC 614001 (third edition) neglects the variation in wind shear by using the average value. This may lead to a nonconservative assessment of blade root flapwise fatigue loads, which are sensitive to wind shear. The results in this paper indicate that using a 75% quantile for the wind shear at each wind speed bin leads to an appropriate, but conservative, assessment of the fatigue loads. However, care should be taken when using this approach for components where low or negative wind shears can lead to large fatigue loads. This is the case for some drivetrain components where a lower quantile may be required.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Stensgaard Toft, Henrik | |
| contributor author | Svenningsen, Lasse | |
| contributor author | Moser, Wolfgang | |
| contributor author | Dalsgaard Sأ¸rensen, John | |
| contributor author | Lybech Thأ¸gersen, Morten | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T01:33:06Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T01:33:06Z | |
| date issued | 2016 | |
| identifier issn | 0199-6231 | |
| identifier other | sol_138_03_031011.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/162475 | |
| description abstract | Sitespecific assessment of wind turbine design requires verification that the individual wind turbine components can survive the sitespecific wind climate. The wind turbine design standard, IEC 614001 (third edition), describes how this should be done using a simplified, equivalent wind climate established from the onsite distribution functions of the horizontal mean wind speeds, the 90% quantile of turbulence along with average values of vertical wind shear and air density and the maximum flow inclination. This paper investigates the accuracy of fatigue loads estimated using this equivalent wind climate required by the current design standard by comparing damage equivalent fatigue loads estimated based on wind climate parameters for each 10 min timeseries with fatigue loads estimated based on the equivalent wind climate parameters. Wind measurements from Boulder, CO, in the United States and Hأ¸vsأ¸re in Denmark have been used to estimate the natural variation in the wind conditions between 10 min time periods. The structural wind turbine loads have been simulated using the aeroelastic model FAST. The results show that using a 90% quantile for the turbulence leads to an accurate assessment of the blade root flapwise bending moment and a conservative assessment of the tower bottom foraft bending moment and low speed shaft torque. Currently, IEC 614001 (third edition) neglects the variation in wind shear by using the average value. This may lead to a nonconservative assessment of blade root flapwise fatigue loads, which are sensitive to wind shear. The results in this paper indicate that using a 75% quantile for the wind shear at each wind speed bin leads to an appropriate, but conservative, assessment of the fatigue loads. However, care should be taken when using this approach for components where low or negative wind shears can lead to large fatigue loads. This is the case for some drivetrain components where a lower quantile may be required. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Wind Climate Parameters for Wind Turbine Fatigue Load Assessment | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 138 | |
| journal issue | 3 | |
| journal title | Journal of Solar Energy Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4033111 | |
| journal fristpage | 31010 | |
| journal lastpage | 31010 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-8986 | |
| tree | Journal of Solar Energy Engineering:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 003 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |