Show simple item record

contributor authorStensgaard Toft, Henrik
contributor authorSvenningsen, Lasse
contributor authorMoser, Wolfgang
contributor authorDalsgaard Sأ¸rensen, John
contributor authorLybech Thأ¸gersen, Morten
date accessioned2017-05-09T01:33:06Z
date available2017-05-09T01:33:06Z
date issued2016
identifier issn0199-6231
identifier othersol_138_03_031011.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/162475
description abstractSitespecific assessment of wind turbine design requires verification that the individual wind turbine components can survive the sitespecific wind climate. The wind turbine design standard, IEC 614001 (third edition), describes how this should be done using a simplified, equivalent wind climate established from the onsite distribution functions of the horizontal mean wind speeds, the 90% quantile of turbulence along with average values of vertical wind shear and air density and the maximum flow inclination. This paper investigates the accuracy of fatigue loads estimated using this equivalent wind climate required by the current design standard by comparing damage equivalent fatigue loads estimated based on wind climate parameters for each 10 min timeseries with fatigue loads estimated based on the equivalent wind climate parameters. Wind measurements from Boulder, CO, in the United States and Hأ¸vsأ¸re in Denmark have been used to estimate the natural variation in the wind conditions between 10 min time periods. The structural wind turbine loads have been simulated using the aeroelastic model FAST. The results show that using a 90% quantile for the turbulence leads to an accurate assessment of the blade root flapwise bending moment and a conservative assessment of the tower bottom foraft bending moment and low speed shaft torque. Currently, IEC 614001 (third edition) neglects the variation in wind shear by using the average value. This may lead to a nonconservative assessment of blade root flapwise fatigue loads, which are sensitive to wind shear. The results in this paper indicate that using a 75% quantile for the wind shear at each wind speed bin leads to an appropriate, but conservative, assessment of the fatigue loads. However, care should be taken when using this approach for components where low or negative wind shears can lead to large fatigue loads. This is the case for some drivetrain components where a lower quantile may be required.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleWind Climate Parameters for Wind Turbine Fatigue Load Assessment
typeJournal Paper
journal volume138
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Solar Energy Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.4033111
journal fristpage31010
journal lastpage31010
identifier eissn1528-8986
treeJournal of Solar Energy Engineering:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record