Assessment of Drag Models for Geldart A Particles in Bubbling Fluidized BedsSource: Journal of Fluids Engineering:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 003::page 31105DOI: 10.1115/1.4031490Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: In order to accurately predict the hydrodynamic behavior of gas and solid phases using an Eulerian–Eulerian approach, it is crucial to use appropriate drag models to capture the correct physics. In this study, the performance of seven drag models for fluidization of Geldart A particles of coal, poplar wood, and their mixtures was assessed. In spite of the previous findings that bode badly for using predominately Geldart B drag models for fine particles, the results of our study revealed that if static regions of mass in the fluidized beds are considered, these drag models work well with Geldart A particles. It was found that drag models derived from empirical relationships adopt better with Geldart A particles compared to drag models that were numerically developed. Overall, the Huilin–Gidaspow drag model showed the best performance for both single solid phases and binary mixtures, however, for binary mixtures, Wen–Yu model predictions were also accurate.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Estejab, Bahareh | |
| contributor author | Battaglia, Francine | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T01:29:22Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T01:29:22Z | |
| date issued | 2016 | |
| identifier issn | 0098-2202 | |
| identifier other | fe_138_03_031105.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/161326 | |
| description abstract | In order to accurately predict the hydrodynamic behavior of gas and solid phases using an Eulerian–Eulerian approach, it is crucial to use appropriate drag models to capture the correct physics. In this study, the performance of seven drag models for fluidization of Geldart A particles of coal, poplar wood, and their mixtures was assessed. In spite of the previous findings that bode badly for using predominately Geldart B drag models for fine particles, the results of our study revealed that if static regions of mass in the fluidized beds are considered, these drag models work well with Geldart A particles. It was found that drag models derived from empirical relationships adopt better with Geldart A particles compared to drag models that were numerically developed. Overall, the Huilin–Gidaspow drag model showed the best performance for both single solid phases and binary mixtures, however, for binary mixtures, Wen–Yu model predictions were also accurate. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Assessment of Drag Models for Geldart A Particles in Bubbling Fluidized Beds | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 138 | |
| journal issue | 3 | |
| journal title | Journal of Fluids Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4031490 | |
| journal fristpage | 31105 | |
| journal lastpage | 31105 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-901X | |
| tree | Journal of Fluids Engineering:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 003 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |