Show simple item record

contributor authorEstejab, Bahareh
contributor authorBattaglia, Francine
date accessioned2017-05-09T01:29:22Z
date available2017-05-09T01:29:22Z
date issued2016
identifier issn0098-2202
identifier otherfe_138_03_031105.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/161326
description abstractIn order to accurately predict the hydrodynamic behavior of gas and solid phases using an Eulerian–Eulerian approach, it is crucial to use appropriate drag models to capture the correct physics. In this study, the performance of seven drag models for fluidization of Geldart A particles of coal, poplar wood, and their mixtures was assessed. In spite of the previous findings that bode badly for using predominately Geldart B drag models for fine particles, the results of our study revealed that if static regions of mass in the fluidized beds are considered, these drag models work well with Geldart A particles. It was found that drag models derived from empirical relationships adopt better with Geldart A particles compared to drag models that were numerically developed. Overall, the Huilin–Gidaspow drag model showed the best performance for both single solid phases and binary mixtures, however, for binary mixtures, Wen–Yu model predictions were also accurate.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleAssessment of Drag Models for Geldart A Particles in Bubbling Fluidized Beds
typeJournal Paper
journal volume138
journal issue3
journal titleJournal of Fluids Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.4031490
journal fristpage31105
journal lastpage31105
identifier eissn1528-901X
treeJournal of Fluids Engineering:;2016:;volume( 138 ):;issue: 003
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record