Roughness Corrections for the k–د‰ Shear Stress Transport Model: Status and ProposalsSource: Journal of Fluids Engineering:;2015:;volume( 137 ):;issue: 002::page 21202Author:Aupoix, B.
DOI: 10.1115/1.4028122Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: Various corrections were previously proposed to account for wall roughness with the k–د‰ and shear stress transport (SST) models. A simplified analysis, based upon the wall region analysis, is proposed to characterize the behavior of these roughness corrections. As this analysis points out some deficiencies for each correction, two new corrections are proposed for the SST model, to reproduce different behaviors, mainly in the transition regime. The correction development is based upon a previously developed strategy. A large set of boundary layer experiments is used to compare the different roughness corrections, confirm the failures of previous proposals, and validate the present ones. Moreover, it assesses the proposed simplified analysis. It also evidences the difficulty to determine the equivalent sand grain roughness for a given surface. The Colebrook based correction is recommended while the Nikuradse based one can add information about the envelope of possible behaviors in the transition regime.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Aupoix, B. | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T01:18:43Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T01:18:43Z | |
| date issued | 2015 | |
| identifier issn | 0098-2202 | |
| identifier other | fe_137_02_021202.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/158188 | |
| description abstract | Various corrections were previously proposed to account for wall roughness with the k–د‰ and shear stress transport (SST) models. A simplified analysis, based upon the wall region analysis, is proposed to characterize the behavior of these roughness corrections. As this analysis points out some deficiencies for each correction, two new corrections are proposed for the SST model, to reproduce different behaviors, mainly in the transition regime. The correction development is based upon a previously developed strategy. A large set of boundary layer experiments is used to compare the different roughness corrections, confirm the failures of previous proposals, and validate the present ones. Moreover, it assesses the proposed simplified analysis. It also evidences the difficulty to determine the equivalent sand grain roughness for a given surface. The Colebrook based correction is recommended while the Nikuradse based one can add information about the envelope of possible behaviors in the transition regime. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Roughness Corrections for the k–د‰ Shear Stress Transport Model: Status and Proposals | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 137 | |
| journal issue | 2 | |
| journal title | Journal of Fluids Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4028122 | |
| journal fristpage | 21202 | |
| journal lastpage | 21202 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-901X | |
| tree | Journal of Fluids Engineering:;2015:;volume( 137 ):;issue: 002 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |