YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Discrete Decision Continuous Actuation Control: Balance of an Inverted Pendulum and Pumping a Pendulum Swing

    Source: Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control:;2015:;volume( 137 ):;issue: 005::page 51012
    Author:
    Bhounsule, Pranav A.
    ,
    Ruina, Andy
    ,
    Stiesberg, Gregg
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4028851
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: In some practical control problems of essentially continuous systems, the goal is not to tightly track a trajectory in state space, but only some aspects of the state at various points along the trajectory, and possibly only loosely. Here, we show examples in which classical discretecontrol approaches can provide simple, low input, and low outputbandwidth control of such systems. The sensing occurs at discrete stateor timebased events. Based on the state at the event, we set a small set of control parameters. These parameters prescribe features, e.g., amplitudes of openloop commands that, assuming perfect modeling, force the system to, or toward, goal points in the trajectory. Using this discrete decision continuous actuation (DDCA) control approach, we demonstrate stabilization of two examples: (1) linear “deadbeatâ€‌ control of a time delayed linearized inverted pendulum and (2) pumping of a hanging pendulum. Advantages of this approach include: It is computationally cheap compared to realtime control or online optimization; it can handle long time delays; it can fully correct disturbances in finite time (deadbeat control); it can be simple, using few control gains and set points and limited sensing; and it provides low bandwidth for both sensing and actuator commands. We have found the approach is useful for controlling robotic walking.
    • Download: (1.096Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Discrete Decision Continuous Actuation Control: Balance of an Inverted Pendulum and Pumping a Pendulum Swing

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/157519
    Collections
    • Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control

    Show full item record

    contributor authorBhounsule, Pranav A.
    contributor authorRuina, Andy
    contributor authorStiesberg, Gregg
    date accessioned2017-05-09T01:16:27Z
    date available2017-05-09T01:16:27Z
    date issued2015
    identifier issn0022-0434
    identifier otherds_137_05_051012.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/157519
    description abstractIn some practical control problems of essentially continuous systems, the goal is not to tightly track a trajectory in state space, but only some aspects of the state at various points along the trajectory, and possibly only loosely. Here, we show examples in which classical discretecontrol approaches can provide simple, low input, and low outputbandwidth control of such systems. The sensing occurs at discrete stateor timebased events. Based on the state at the event, we set a small set of control parameters. These parameters prescribe features, e.g., amplitudes of openloop commands that, assuming perfect modeling, force the system to, or toward, goal points in the trajectory. Using this discrete decision continuous actuation (DDCA) control approach, we demonstrate stabilization of two examples: (1) linear “deadbeatâ€‌ control of a time delayed linearized inverted pendulum and (2) pumping of a hanging pendulum. Advantages of this approach include: It is computationally cheap compared to realtime control or online optimization; it can handle long time delays; it can fully correct disturbances in finite time (deadbeat control); it can be simple, using few control gains and set points and limited sensing; and it provides low bandwidth for both sensing and actuator commands. We have found the approach is useful for controlling robotic walking.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleDiscrete Decision Continuous Actuation Control: Balance of an Inverted Pendulum and Pumping a Pendulum Swing
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume137
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4028851
    journal fristpage51012
    journal lastpage51012
    identifier eissn1528-9028
    treeJournal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control:;2015:;volume( 137 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian