What Portion of the Soft Tissue Artefact Requires Compensation When Estimating Joint Kinematics?Source: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2015:;volume( 137 ):;issue: 006::page 64502Author:Dumas, Raphaأ«l
,
Camomilla, Valentina
,
Bonci, Tecla
,
Chأ¨ze, Laurence
,
Cappozzo, Aurelio
DOI: 10.1115/1.4030363Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: When joint kinematics is analyzed using noninvasive stereophotogrammetry, movements of the skin markers relative to the underlying bone are regarded as artefacts (soft tissue artefact (STA)). Recent literature suggests that an appropriate estimation of joint kinematics may be obtained by compensating for only a portion of the STA, but no evidence for this case has been reported, and which portion of the STA should be selected remains an issue. The aim of this study was to fill this gap. A modal approach was used to represent the STA. This resulted in a series of additive components (modes) and in the possibility to select a subset of them. The following STA definitions were used: individual skin marker displacement (MD), markercluster geometrical transformation (GT), and skin envelope shape variation (SV). An STA approximation for each of the three definitions was obtained by ordering modes on the basis of their contribution to the total STA energy and truncating the relevant series at 90% of it. A fourth approximation was obtained when the GT definition was used, by selecting the modes that represented the markercluster rigid transformation (i.e., three translation and three rotation modes). The different STA approximations were compared using data obtained during the stance phase of running of three volunteers carrying both pin and skin markers. The STA was measured and knee joint kinematics estimated using four skin marker datasets compensated for the abovementioned STA approximations. Accuracy was assessed by comparing results to the reference kinematics obtained using pin markers. The different approximations resulted in different numbers of modes. For joint angles, the compensation efficiency across the STA approximations based on an energy threshold was almost equivalent. The median root mean square errors (RMSEs) were below 1 deg for flexion/extension and 2 deg for both abduction/adduction and internal/external rotation. For the joint displacements, the compensation efficiency depended on the STA approximation. Median RMSEs for anterior/posterior displacement ranged from 1 to 4 mm using either MD, GT, or SV truncated series. The RMSEs were virtually null when the STA was approximated using only the GT rigid modes. This result, together with the limited number of modes used by this approximation (i.e., three translations and three rotations of the markercluster), makes the STA rigid component and a good candidate for designing an STA model to be incorporated in an enhanced bone pose estimator.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Dumas, Raphaأ«l | |
| contributor author | Camomilla, Valentina | |
| contributor author | Bonci, Tecla | |
| contributor author | Chأ¨ze, Laurence | |
| contributor author | Cappozzo, Aurelio | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T01:15:15Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T01:15:15Z | |
| date issued | 2015 | |
| identifier issn | 0148-0731 | |
| identifier other | bio_137_06_064502.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/157138 | |
| description abstract | When joint kinematics is analyzed using noninvasive stereophotogrammetry, movements of the skin markers relative to the underlying bone are regarded as artefacts (soft tissue artefact (STA)). Recent literature suggests that an appropriate estimation of joint kinematics may be obtained by compensating for only a portion of the STA, but no evidence for this case has been reported, and which portion of the STA should be selected remains an issue. The aim of this study was to fill this gap. A modal approach was used to represent the STA. This resulted in a series of additive components (modes) and in the possibility to select a subset of them. The following STA definitions were used: individual skin marker displacement (MD), markercluster geometrical transformation (GT), and skin envelope shape variation (SV). An STA approximation for each of the three definitions was obtained by ordering modes on the basis of their contribution to the total STA energy and truncating the relevant series at 90% of it. A fourth approximation was obtained when the GT definition was used, by selecting the modes that represented the markercluster rigid transformation (i.e., three translation and three rotation modes). The different STA approximations were compared using data obtained during the stance phase of running of three volunteers carrying both pin and skin markers. The STA was measured and knee joint kinematics estimated using four skin marker datasets compensated for the abovementioned STA approximations. Accuracy was assessed by comparing results to the reference kinematics obtained using pin markers. The different approximations resulted in different numbers of modes. For joint angles, the compensation efficiency across the STA approximations based on an energy threshold was almost equivalent. The median root mean square errors (RMSEs) were below 1 deg for flexion/extension and 2 deg for both abduction/adduction and internal/external rotation. For the joint displacements, the compensation efficiency depended on the STA approximation. Median RMSEs for anterior/posterior displacement ranged from 1 to 4 mm using either MD, GT, or SV truncated series. The RMSEs were virtually null when the STA was approximated using only the GT rigid modes. This result, together with the limited number of modes used by this approximation (i.e., three translations and three rotations of the markercluster), makes the STA rigid component and a good candidate for designing an STA model to be incorporated in an enhanced bone pose estimator. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | What Portion of the Soft Tissue Artefact Requires Compensation When Estimating Joint Kinematics? | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 137 | |
| journal issue | 6 | |
| journal title | Journal of Biomechanical Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4030363 | |
| journal fristpage | 64502 | |
| journal lastpage | 64502 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-8951 | |
| tree | Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2015:;volume( 137 ):;issue: 006 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |