YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    What Portion of the Soft Tissue Artefact Requires Compensation When Estimating Joint Kinematics?

    Source: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2015:;volume( 137 ):;issue: 006::page 64502
    Author:
    Dumas, Raphaأ«l
    ,
    Camomilla, Valentina
    ,
    Bonci, Tecla
    ,
    Chأ¨ze, Laurence
    ,
    Cappozzo, Aurelio
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4030363
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: When joint kinematics is analyzed using noninvasive stereophotogrammetry, movements of the skin markers relative to the underlying bone are regarded as artefacts (soft tissue artefact (STA)). Recent literature suggests that an appropriate estimation of joint kinematics may be obtained by compensating for only a portion of the STA, but no evidence for this case has been reported, and which portion of the STA should be selected remains an issue. The aim of this study was to fill this gap. A modal approach was used to represent the STA. This resulted in a series of additive components (modes) and in the possibility to select a subset of them. The following STA definitions were used: individual skin marker displacement (MD), markercluster geometrical transformation (GT), and skin envelope shape variation (SV). An STA approximation for each of the three definitions was obtained by ordering modes on the basis of their contribution to the total STA energy and truncating the relevant series at 90% of it. A fourth approximation was obtained when the GT definition was used, by selecting the modes that represented the markercluster rigid transformation (i.e., three translation and three rotation modes). The different STA approximations were compared using data obtained during the stance phase of running of three volunteers carrying both pin and skin markers. The STA was measured and knee joint kinematics estimated using four skin marker datasets compensated for the abovementioned STA approximations. Accuracy was assessed by comparing results to the reference kinematics obtained using pin markers. The different approximations resulted in different numbers of modes. For joint angles, the compensation efficiency across the STA approximations based on an energy threshold was almost equivalent. The median root mean square errors (RMSEs) were below 1 deg for flexion/extension and 2 deg for both abduction/adduction and internal/external rotation. For the joint displacements, the compensation efficiency depended on the STA approximation. Median RMSEs for anterior/posterior displacement ranged from 1 to 4 mm using either MD, GT, or SV truncated series. The RMSEs were virtually null when the STA was approximated using only the GT rigid modes. This result, together with the limited number of modes used by this approximation (i.e., three translations and three rotations of the markercluster), makes the STA rigid component and a good candidate for designing an STA model to be incorporated in an enhanced bone pose estimator.
    • Download: (476.9Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      What Portion of the Soft Tissue Artefact Requires Compensation When Estimating Joint Kinematics?

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/157138
    Collections
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorDumas, Raphaأ«l
    contributor authorCamomilla, Valentina
    contributor authorBonci, Tecla
    contributor authorChأ¨ze, Laurence
    contributor authorCappozzo, Aurelio
    date accessioned2017-05-09T01:15:15Z
    date available2017-05-09T01:15:15Z
    date issued2015
    identifier issn0148-0731
    identifier otherbio_137_06_064502.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/157138
    description abstractWhen joint kinematics is analyzed using noninvasive stereophotogrammetry, movements of the skin markers relative to the underlying bone are regarded as artefacts (soft tissue artefact (STA)). Recent literature suggests that an appropriate estimation of joint kinematics may be obtained by compensating for only a portion of the STA, but no evidence for this case has been reported, and which portion of the STA should be selected remains an issue. The aim of this study was to fill this gap. A modal approach was used to represent the STA. This resulted in a series of additive components (modes) and in the possibility to select a subset of them. The following STA definitions were used: individual skin marker displacement (MD), markercluster geometrical transformation (GT), and skin envelope shape variation (SV). An STA approximation for each of the three definitions was obtained by ordering modes on the basis of their contribution to the total STA energy and truncating the relevant series at 90% of it. A fourth approximation was obtained when the GT definition was used, by selecting the modes that represented the markercluster rigid transformation (i.e., three translation and three rotation modes). The different STA approximations were compared using data obtained during the stance phase of running of three volunteers carrying both pin and skin markers. The STA was measured and knee joint kinematics estimated using four skin marker datasets compensated for the abovementioned STA approximations. Accuracy was assessed by comparing results to the reference kinematics obtained using pin markers. The different approximations resulted in different numbers of modes. For joint angles, the compensation efficiency across the STA approximations based on an energy threshold was almost equivalent. The median root mean square errors (RMSEs) were below 1 deg for flexion/extension and 2 deg for both abduction/adduction and internal/external rotation. For the joint displacements, the compensation efficiency depended on the STA approximation. Median RMSEs for anterior/posterior displacement ranged from 1 to 4 mm using either MD, GT, or SV truncated series. The RMSEs were virtually null when the STA was approximated using only the GT rigid modes. This result, together with the limited number of modes used by this approximation (i.e., three translations and three rotations of the markercluster), makes the STA rigid component and a good candidate for designing an STA model to be incorporated in an enhanced bone pose estimator.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleWhat Portion of the Soft Tissue Artefact Requires Compensation When Estimating Joint Kinematics?
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume137
    journal issue6
    journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4030363
    journal fristpage64502
    journal lastpage64502
    identifier eissn1528-8951
    treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2015:;volume( 137 ):;issue: 006
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian