Show simple item record

contributor authorDumas, Raphaأ«l
contributor authorCamomilla, Valentina
contributor authorBonci, Tecla
contributor authorChأ¨ze, Laurence
contributor authorCappozzo, Aurelio
date accessioned2017-05-09T01:15:15Z
date available2017-05-09T01:15:15Z
date issued2015
identifier issn0148-0731
identifier otherbio_137_06_064502.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/157138
description abstractWhen joint kinematics is analyzed using noninvasive stereophotogrammetry, movements of the skin markers relative to the underlying bone are regarded as artefacts (soft tissue artefact (STA)). Recent literature suggests that an appropriate estimation of joint kinematics may be obtained by compensating for only a portion of the STA, but no evidence for this case has been reported, and which portion of the STA should be selected remains an issue. The aim of this study was to fill this gap. A modal approach was used to represent the STA. This resulted in a series of additive components (modes) and in the possibility to select a subset of them. The following STA definitions were used: individual skin marker displacement (MD), markercluster geometrical transformation (GT), and skin envelope shape variation (SV). An STA approximation for each of the three definitions was obtained by ordering modes on the basis of their contribution to the total STA energy and truncating the relevant series at 90% of it. A fourth approximation was obtained when the GT definition was used, by selecting the modes that represented the markercluster rigid transformation (i.e., three translation and three rotation modes). The different STA approximations were compared using data obtained during the stance phase of running of three volunteers carrying both pin and skin markers. The STA was measured and knee joint kinematics estimated using four skin marker datasets compensated for the abovementioned STA approximations. Accuracy was assessed by comparing results to the reference kinematics obtained using pin markers. The different approximations resulted in different numbers of modes. For joint angles, the compensation efficiency across the STA approximations based on an energy threshold was almost equivalent. The median root mean square errors (RMSEs) were below 1 deg for flexion/extension and 2 deg for both abduction/adduction and internal/external rotation. For the joint displacements, the compensation efficiency depended on the STA approximation. Median RMSEs for anterior/posterior displacement ranged from 1 to 4 mm using either MD, GT, or SV truncated series. The RMSEs were virtually null when the STA was approximated using only the GT rigid modes. This result, together with the limited number of modes used by this approximation (i.e., three translations and three rotations of the markercluster), makes the STA rigid component and a good candidate for designing an STA model to be incorporated in an enhanced bone pose estimator.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleWhat Portion of the Soft Tissue Artefact Requires Compensation When Estimating Joint Kinematics?
typeJournal Paper
journal volume137
journal issue6
journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.4030363
journal fristpage64502
journal lastpage64502
identifier eissn1528-8951
treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2015:;volume( 137 ):;issue: 006
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record