YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Biomechanical Measurements of Stiffness and Strength for Five Types of Whole Human and Artificial Humeri

    Source: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2014:;volume( 136 ):;issue: 005::page 51006
    Author:
    Aziz, Mina S. R.
    ,
    Nicayenzi, Bruce
    ,
    Crookshank, Meghan C.
    ,
    Bougherara, Habiba
    ,
    Schemitsch, Emil H.
    ,
    Zdero, Radovan
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4027057
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: The human humerus is the third largest longbone and experiences 2–3% of all fractures. Yet, almost no data exist on its intact biomechanical properties, thus preventing researchers from obtaining a full understanding of humerus behavior during injury and after being repaired with fracture plates and nails. The aim of this experimental study was to compare the biomechanical stiffness and strength of “gold standardâ€‌ freshfrozen humeri to a variety of humerus models. A series of five types of intact whole humeri were obtained: human freshfrozen (n = 19); human embalmed (n = 18); human dried (n = 15); artificial “normalâ€‌ (n = 12); and artificial “osteoporoticâ€‌ (n = 12). Humeri were tested under “real worldâ€‌ clinical loading modes for shear stiffness, torsional stiffness, cantilever bending stiffness, and cantilever bending strength. After removing geometric effects, freshfrozen results were 585.8 آ±â€‰181.5 N/mm2 (normalized shear stiffness); 3.1 آ±â€‰1.1 N/(mm2 deg) (normalized torsional stiffness); 850.8 آ±â€‰347.9 N/mm2 (normalized cantilever stiffness); and 8.3 آ±â€‰2.7 N/mm2 (normalized cantilever strength). Compared to freshfrozen values, statistical equivalence (p ≥ 0.05) was obtained for all four test modes (embalmed humeri), 1 of 4 test modes (dried humeri), 1 of 4 test modes (artificial “normalâ€‌ humeri), and 1 of 4 test modes (artificial “osteoporoticâ€‌ humeri). Age and bone mineral density versus experimental results had Pearson linear correlations ranging from R = −0.57 to 0.80. About 77% of human humeri failed via a transverse or oblique distal shaft fracture, whilst 88% of artificial humeri failed with a mixed transverse + oblique fracture. To date, this is the most comprehensive study on the biomechanics of intact human and artificial humeri and can assist researchers to choose an alternate humerus model that can substitute for freshfrozen humeri.
    • Download: (2.681Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Biomechanical Measurements of Stiffness and Strength for Five Types of Whole Human and Artificial Humeri

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/154003
    Collections
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorAziz, Mina S. R.
    contributor authorNicayenzi, Bruce
    contributor authorCrookshank, Meghan C.
    contributor authorBougherara, Habiba
    contributor authorSchemitsch, Emil H.
    contributor authorZdero, Radovan
    date accessioned2017-05-09T01:05:25Z
    date available2017-05-09T01:05:25Z
    date issued2014
    identifier issn0148-0731
    identifier otherbio_136_05_051006.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/154003
    description abstractThe human humerus is the third largest longbone and experiences 2–3% of all fractures. Yet, almost no data exist on its intact biomechanical properties, thus preventing researchers from obtaining a full understanding of humerus behavior during injury and after being repaired with fracture plates and nails. The aim of this experimental study was to compare the biomechanical stiffness and strength of “gold standardâ€‌ freshfrozen humeri to a variety of humerus models. A series of five types of intact whole humeri were obtained: human freshfrozen (n = 19); human embalmed (n = 18); human dried (n = 15); artificial “normalâ€‌ (n = 12); and artificial “osteoporoticâ€‌ (n = 12). Humeri were tested under “real worldâ€‌ clinical loading modes for shear stiffness, torsional stiffness, cantilever bending stiffness, and cantilever bending strength. After removing geometric effects, freshfrozen results were 585.8 آ±â€‰181.5 N/mm2 (normalized shear stiffness); 3.1 آ±â€‰1.1 N/(mm2 deg) (normalized torsional stiffness); 850.8 آ±â€‰347.9 N/mm2 (normalized cantilever stiffness); and 8.3 آ±â€‰2.7 N/mm2 (normalized cantilever strength). Compared to freshfrozen values, statistical equivalence (p ≥ 0.05) was obtained for all four test modes (embalmed humeri), 1 of 4 test modes (dried humeri), 1 of 4 test modes (artificial “normalâ€‌ humeri), and 1 of 4 test modes (artificial “osteoporoticâ€‌ humeri). Age and bone mineral density versus experimental results had Pearson linear correlations ranging from R = −0.57 to 0.80. About 77% of human humeri failed via a transverse or oblique distal shaft fracture, whilst 88% of artificial humeri failed with a mixed transverse + oblique fracture. To date, this is the most comprehensive study on the biomechanics of intact human and artificial humeri and can assist researchers to choose an alternate humerus model that can substitute for freshfrozen humeri.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleBiomechanical Measurements of Stiffness and Strength for Five Types of Whole Human and Artificial Humeri
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume136
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4027057
    journal fristpage51006
    journal lastpage51006
    identifier eissn1528-8951
    treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2014:;volume( 136 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian