Show simple item record

contributor authorAziz, Mina S. R.
contributor authorNicayenzi, Bruce
contributor authorCrookshank, Meghan C.
contributor authorBougherara, Habiba
contributor authorSchemitsch, Emil H.
contributor authorZdero, Radovan
date accessioned2017-05-09T01:05:25Z
date available2017-05-09T01:05:25Z
date issued2014
identifier issn0148-0731
identifier otherbio_136_05_051006.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/154003
description abstractThe human humerus is the third largest longbone and experiences 2–3% of all fractures. Yet, almost no data exist on its intact biomechanical properties, thus preventing researchers from obtaining a full understanding of humerus behavior during injury and after being repaired with fracture plates and nails. The aim of this experimental study was to compare the biomechanical stiffness and strength of “gold standardâ€‌ freshfrozen humeri to a variety of humerus models. A series of five types of intact whole humeri were obtained: human freshfrozen (n = 19); human embalmed (n = 18); human dried (n = 15); artificial “normalâ€‌ (n = 12); and artificial “osteoporoticâ€‌ (n = 12). Humeri were tested under “real worldâ€‌ clinical loading modes for shear stiffness, torsional stiffness, cantilever bending stiffness, and cantilever bending strength. After removing geometric effects, freshfrozen results were 585.8 آ±â€‰181.5 N/mm2 (normalized shear stiffness); 3.1 آ±â€‰1.1 N/(mm2 deg) (normalized torsional stiffness); 850.8 آ±â€‰347.9 N/mm2 (normalized cantilever stiffness); and 8.3 آ±â€‰2.7 N/mm2 (normalized cantilever strength). Compared to freshfrozen values, statistical equivalence (p ≥ 0.05) was obtained for all four test modes (embalmed humeri), 1 of 4 test modes (dried humeri), 1 of 4 test modes (artificial “normalâ€‌ humeri), and 1 of 4 test modes (artificial “osteoporoticâ€‌ humeri). Age and bone mineral density versus experimental results had Pearson linear correlations ranging from R = −0.57 to 0.80. About 77% of human humeri failed via a transverse or oblique distal shaft fracture, whilst 88% of artificial humeri failed with a mixed transverse + oblique fracture. To date, this is the most comprehensive study on the biomechanics of intact human and artificial humeri and can assist researchers to choose an alternate humerus model that can substitute for freshfrozen humeri.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleBiomechanical Measurements of Stiffness and Strength for Five Types of Whole Human and Artificial Humeri
typeJournal Paper
journal volume136
journal issue5
journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.4027057
journal fristpage51006
journal lastpage51006
identifier eissn1528-8951
treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2014:;volume( 136 ):;issue: 005
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record