Correction to Design Equation for Spring Diametral Growth Upon CompressionSource: Journal of Mechanical Design:;2013:;volume( 135 ):;issue: 012::page 124503DOI: 10.1115/1.4025195Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: In the textbook by Wahl (1963, Mechanical Springs, 2nd ed., McGrawHill, New York, Chap. 20), he derived an equation predicting the diametral growth of a helical spring as the spring is compressed from free to solid height, and the spring's ends are free to rotate. A recent comparison with test data for growth of compression springs revealed that the calculated growth predicted by the Wahl formula did not agree well with measured values. Review of the Wahl derivation uncovered an arithmetic error that, when corrected, brought the calculated and measured diameters into closer agreement. The corrected diametral growth equation presented herein bounds the original data provided by Wahl, better matches an alternate growth equation derived by Ancker and Goodier for most springs evaluated, predicts larger growth than the original Wahl equation, and is a better fit to recent measured data.
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Bockwoldt, T. S. | |
| contributor author | Munsick, G. A. | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T01:01:06Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T01:01:06Z | |
| date issued | 2013 | |
| identifier issn | 1050-0472 | |
| identifier other | md_135_12_124503.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/152579 | |
| description abstract | In the textbook by Wahl (1963, Mechanical Springs, 2nd ed., McGrawHill, New York, Chap. 20), he derived an equation predicting the diametral growth of a helical spring as the spring is compressed from free to solid height, and the spring's ends are free to rotate. A recent comparison with test data for growth of compression springs revealed that the calculated growth predicted by the Wahl formula did not agree well with measured values. Review of the Wahl derivation uncovered an arithmetic error that, when corrected, brought the calculated and measured diameters into closer agreement. The corrected diametral growth equation presented herein bounds the original data provided by Wahl, better matches an alternate growth equation derived by Ancker and Goodier for most springs evaluated, predicts larger growth than the original Wahl equation, and is a better fit to recent measured data. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Correction to Design Equation for Spring Diametral Growth Upon Compression | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 135 | |
| journal issue | 12 | |
| journal title | Journal of Mechanical Design | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4025195 | |
| journal fristpage | 124503 | |
| journal lastpage | 124503 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-9001 | |
| tree | Journal of Mechanical Design:;2013:;volume( 135 ):;issue: 012 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |