Show simple item record

contributor authorBockwoldt, T. S.
contributor authorMunsick, G. A.
date accessioned2017-05-09T01:01:06Z
date available2017-05-09T01:01:06Z
date issued2013
identifier issn1050-0472
identifier othermd_135_12_124503.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/152579
description abstractIn the textbook by Wahl (1963, Mechanical Springs, 2nd ed., McGrawHill, New York, Chap. 20), he derived an equation predicting the diametral growth of a helical spring as the spring is compressed from free to solid height, and the spring's ends are free to rotate. A recent comparison with test data for growth of compression springs revealed that the calculated growth predicted by the Wahl formula did not agree well with measured values. Review of the Wahl derivation uncovered an arithmetic error that, when corrected, brought the calculated and measured diameters into closer agreement. The corrected diametral growth equation presented herein bounds the original data provided by Wahl, better matches an alternate growth equation derived by Ancker and Goodier for most springs evaluated, predicts larger growth than the original Wahl equation, and is a better fit to recent measured data.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleCorrection to Design Equation for Spring Diametral Growth Upon Compression
typeJournal Paper
journal volume135
journal issue12
journal titleJournal of Mechanical Design
identifier doi10.1115/1.4025195
journal fristpage124503
journal lastpage124503
identifier eissn1528-9001
treeJournal of Mechanical Design:;2013:;volume( 135 ):;issue: 012
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record