Biomechanical Measurements of Surgical Drilling Force and Torque in Human Versus Artificial FemursSource: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2012:;volume( 134 ):;issue: 012::page 124503Author:Troy MacAvelia
,
Meisam Salahi
,
Michael Olsen
,
Meghan Crookshank
,
Emil H. Schemitsch
,
Ahmad Ghasempoor
,
Farrokh Janabi-Sharifi
,
Rad Zdero
DOI: 10.1115/1.4007953Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: Few experimental studies have examined surgical drilling in human bone, and no studies have inquired into this aspect for a popular commercially-available artificial bone used in biomechanical studies. Sixteen fresh-frozen human femurs and five artificial femurs were obtained. Cortical specimens were mounted into a clamping system equipped with a thrust force and torque transducer. Using a CNC machine, unicortical holes were drilled in each specimen at 1000 rpm, 1250 rpm, and 1500 rpm with a 3.2 mm diameter surgical drill bit. Feed rate was 120 mm/min. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Force at increasing spindle speed (1000 rpm, 1250 rpm, and 1500 rpm), respectively, showed a range for human femurs (198.4 ± 14.2 N, 180.6 ± 14.0 N, and 176.3 ± 11.2 N) and artificial femurs (87.2 ± 19.3 N, 82.2 ± 11.2 N, and 75.7 ± 8.8 N). For human femurs, force at 1000 rpm was greater than at other speeds (p ≤ 0.018). For artificial femurs, there was no speed effect on force (p ≥ 0.991). Torque at increasing spindle speed (1000 rpm, 1250 rpm, and 1500 rpm), respectively, showed a range for human femurs (186.3 ± 16.9 N·mm, 157.8 ± 16.1 N·mm, and 140.2 ± 16.4 N·mm) and artificial femurs (67.2 ± 8.4 N·mm, 61.0 ± 2.9 N·mm, and 53.3 ± 2.9 N·mm). For human femurs, torque at 1000 rpm was greater than at other speeds (p < 0.001). For artificial femurs, there was no difference in torque for 1000 rpm versus higher speeds (p ≥ 0.228), and there was only a borderline difference between the higher speeds (p = 0.046). Concerning human versus artificial femurs, their behavior was different at every speed (force, p ≤ 0.001; torque, p < 0.001). For human specimens at 1500 rpm, force and torque were linearly correlated with standardized bone mineral density (sBMD) and the T-score used to clinically categorize bone quality (R ≥ 0.56), but there was poor correlation with age at all speeds (R ≤ 0.37). These artificial bones fail to replicate force and torque in human cortical bone during surgical drilling. To date, this is the largest series of human long bones biomechanically tested for surgical drilling.
keyword(s): Force , Torque , Drilling , Bits (Tools) , Spindles (Textile machinery) , Bone , Surgery AND Biomechanics ,
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Troy MacAvelia | |
| contributor author | Meisam Salahi | |
| contributor author | Michael Olsen | |
| contributor author | Meghan Crookshank | |
| contributor author | Emil H. Schemitsch | |
| contributor author | Ahmad Ghasempoor | |
| contributor author | Farrokh Janabi-Sharifi | |
| contributor author | Rad Zdero | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T00:48:17Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T00:48:17Z | |
| date copyright | 41244 | |
| date issued | 2012 | |
| identifier issn | 0148-0731 | |
| identifier other | JBENDY-926504#bio_134_12_124503.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/148171 | |
| description abstract | Few experimental studies have examined surgical drilling in human bone, and no studies have inquired into this aspect for a popular commercially-available artificial bone used in biomechanical studies. Sixteen fresh-frozen human femurs and five artificial femurs were obtained. Cortical specimens were mounted into a clamping system equipped with a thrust force and torque transducer. Using a CNC machine, unicortical holes were drilled in each specimen at 1000 rpm, 1250 rpm, and 1500 rpm with a 3.2 mm diameter surgical drill bit. Feed rate was 120 mm/min. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Force at increasing spindle speed (1000 rpm, 1250 rpm, and 1500 rpm), respectively, showed a range for human femurs (198.4 ± 14.2 N, 180.6 ± 14.0 N, and 176.3 ± 11.2 N) and artificial femurs (87.2 ± 19.3 N, 82.2 ± 11.2 N, and 75.7 ± 8.8 N). For human femurs, force at 1000 rpm was greater than at other speeds (p ≤ 0.018). For artificial femurs, there was no speed effect on force (p ≥ 0.991). Torque at increasing spindle speed (1000 rpm, 1250 rpm, and 1500 rpm), respectively, showed a range for human femurs (186.3 ± 16.9 N·mm, 157.8 ± 16.1 N·mm, and 140.2 ± 16.4 N·mm) and artificial femurs (67.2 ± 8.4 N·mm, 61.0 ± 2.9 N·mm, and 53.3 ± 2.9 N·mm). For human femurs, torque at 1000 rpm was greater than at other speeds (p < 0.001). For artificial femurs, there was no difference in torque for 1000 rpm versus higher speeds (p ≥ 0.228), and there was only a borderline difference between the higher speeds (p = 0.046). Concerning human versus artificial femurs, their behavior was different at every speed (force, p ≤ 0.001; torque, p < 0.001). For human specimens at 1500 rpm, force and torque were linearly correlated with standardized bone mineral density (sBMD) and the T-score used to clinically categorize bone quality (R ≥ 0.56), but there was poor correlation with age at all speeds (R ≤ 0.37). These artificial bones fail to replicate force and torque in human cortical bone during surgical drilling. To date, this is the largest series of human long bones biomechanically tested for surgical drilling. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Biomechanical Measurements of Surgical Drilling Force and Torque in Human Versus Artificial Femurs | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 134 | |
| journal issue | 12 | |
| journal title | Journal of Biomechanical Engineering | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.4007953 | |
| journal fristpage | 124503 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-8951 | |
| keywords | Force | |
| keywords | Torque | |
| keywords | Drilling | |
| keywords | Bits (Tools) | |
| keywords | Spindles (Textile machinery) | |
| keywords | Bone | |
| keywords | Surgery AND Biomechanics | |
| tree | Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2012:;volume( 134 ):;issue: 012 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |