Show simple item record

contributor authorTroy MacAvelia
contributor authorMeisam Salahi
contributor authorMichael Olsen
contributor authorMeghan Crookshank
contributor authorEmil H. Schemitsch
contributor authorAhmad Ghasempoor
contributor authorFarrokh Janabi-Sharifi
contributor authorRad Zdero
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:48:17Z
date available2017-05-09T00:48:17Z
date copyright41244
date issued2012
identifier issn0148-0731
identifier otherJBENDY-926504#bio_134_12_124503.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/148171
description abstractFew experimental studies have examined surgical drilling in human bone, and no studies have inquired into this aspect for a popular commercially-available artificial bone used in biomechanical studies. Sixteen fresh-frozen human femurs and five artificial femurs were obtained. Cortical specimens were mounted into a clamping system equipped with a thrust force and torque transducer. Using a CNC machine, unicortical holes were drilled in each specimen at 1000 rpm, 1250 rpm, and 1500 rpm with a 3.2 mm diameter surgical drill bit. Feed rate was 120 mm/min. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. Force at increasing spindle speed (1000 rpm, 1250 rpm, and 1500 rpm), respectively, showed a range for human femurs (198.4 ± 14.2 N, 180.6 ± 14.0 N, and 176.3 ± 11.2 N) and artificial femurs (87.2 ± 19.3 N, 82.2 ± 11.2 N, and 75.7 ± 8.8 N). For human femurs, force at 1000 rpm was greater than at other speeds (p ≤ 0.018). For artificial femurs, there was no speed effect on force (p ≥ 0.991). Torque at increasing spindle speed (1000 rpm, 1250 rpm, and 1500 rpm), respectively, showed a range for human femurs (186.3 ± 16.9 N·mm, 157.8 ± 16.1 N·mm, and 140.2 ± 16.4 N·mm) and artificial femurs (67.2 ± 8.4 N·mm, 61.0 ± 2.9 N·mm, and 53.3 ± 2.9 N·mm). For human femurs, torque at 1000 rpm was greater than at other speeds (p < 0.001). For artificial femurs, there was no difference in torque for 1000 rpm versus higher speeds (p ≥ 0.228), and there was only a borderline difference between the higher speeds (p = 0.046). Concerning human versus artificial femurs, their behavior was different at every speed (force, p ≤ 0.001; torque, p < 0.001). For human specimens at 1500 rpm, force and torque were linearly correlated with standardized bone mineral density (sBMD) and the T-score used to clinically categorize bone quality (R ≥ 0.56), but there was poor correlation with age at all speeds (R ≤ 0.37). These artificial bones fail to replicate force and torque in human cortical bone during surgical drilling. To date, this is the largest series of human long bones biomechanically tested for surgical drilling.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleBiomechanical Measurements of Surgical Drilling Force and Torque in Human Versus Artificial Femurs
typeJournal Paper
journal volume134
journal issue12
journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.4007953
journal fristpage124503
identifier eissn1528-8951
keywordsForce
keywordsTorque
keywordsDrilling
keywordsBits (Tools)
keywordsSpindles (Textile machinery)
keywordsBone
keywordsSurgery AND Biomechanics
treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2012:;volume( 134 ):;issue: 012
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record