YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Risk Analysis of Gas Turbines for Natural Gas Liquefaction

    Source: Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2011:;volume( 133 ):;issue: 007::page 71704
    Author:
    Raja S. R. Khan
    ,
    Ian Bennett
    ,
    Maria C. Lagana
    ,
    Stephen O. T. Ogaji
    ,
    Pericles Pilidis
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4002673
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Procurement of process plant equipment involves decisions based not only on an economic agenda but also on long term plant capability, which in turn depends on equipment reliability. As the greater global community raises environmental concerns and pushes for economic reform, a tool is evermore required for a specific and critical selection of plant equipment. Risk assessments based on NASA’s Technology Readiness Level (TRL) scale have been employed in many previous risk models to map technology in terms of risk and reliability. The authors envisage a scale for quantifying the technical risk. The focus of this paper is the technical risk assessment of gas turbines as mechanical drivers for producing liquefied natural gas (LNG). This risk assessment is a cornerstone of the technoeconomic environmental and risk analysis (TERA) philosophy developed by Cranfield University’s Department of Power and Propulsion in U.K. Monte Carlo simulations are used in order to compare the risks of introducing new plant equipment against existing and established plant equipment. Three scenarios are investigated using an 87MW single spool, typical industrial machine, a baseline engine followed by an engine with increased firing temperature, and finally an engine with a zero staged compressor. The results suggest that if the baseline engine was to be upgraded, then the zero staging option would be a better solution than increasing the firing temperature since zero staging gives the lower rise in total time to repair (TTTR) or downtime. The authors suggest a scaling system based on NASA’s TRL but with modified definition criteria for the separate technology readiness levels in order to better relate the scale to gas turbine technology. The intention is to link the modified TRL to downtime, since downtime has been identified as a quantitative measure of technical risk. Latest developments of the modeling are looking at integrating risk analysis and a maintenance cost and scheduling model to provide a platform for total risk assessment. This, coupled with emissions modeling, is set to provide the overall TERA tool for LNG technology selection.
    keyword(s): Engines , Gas turbines , Risk analysis , Failure AND Temperature ,
    • Download: (762.3Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Risk Analysis of Gas Turbines for Natural Gas Liquefaction

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/145991
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power

    Show full item record

    contributor authorRaja S. R. Khan
    contributor authorIan Bennett
    contributor authorMaria C. Lagana
    contributor authorStephen O. T. Ogaji
    contributor authorPericles Pilidis
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:43:36Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:43:36Z
    date copyrightJuly, 2011
    date issued2011
    identifier issn1528-8919
    identifier otherJETPEZ-27168#071704_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/145991
    description abstractProcurement of process plant equipment involves decisions based not only on an economic agenda but also on long term plant capability, which in turn depends on equipment reliability. As the greater global community raises environmental concerns and pushes for economic reform, a tool is evermore required for a specific and critical selection of plant equipment. Risk assessments based on NASA’s Technology Readiness Level (TRL) scale have been employed in many previous risk models to map technology in terms of risk and reliability. The authors envisage a scale for quantifying the technical risk. The focus of this paper is the technical risk assessment of gas turbines as mechanical drivers for producing liquefied natural gas (LNG). This risk assessment is a cornerstone of the technoeconomic environmental and risk analysis (TERA) philosophy developed by Cranfield University’s Department of Power and Propulsion in U.K. Monte Carlo simulations are used in order to compare the risks of introducing new plant equipment against existing and established plant equipment. Three scenarios are investigated using an 87MW single spool, typical industrial machine, a baseline engine followed by an engine with increased firing temperature, and finally an engine with a zero staged compressor. The results suggest that if the baseline engine was to be upgraded, then the zero staging option would be a better solution than increasing the firing temperature since zero staging gives the lower rise in total time to repair (TTTR) or downtime. The authors suggest a scaling system based on NASA’s TRL but with modified definition criteria for the separate technology readiness levels in order to better relate the scale to gas turbine technology. The intention is to link the modified TRL to downtime, since downtime has been identified as a quantitative measure of technical risk. Latest developments of the modeling are looking at integrating risk analysis and a maintenance cost and scheduling model to provide a platform for total risk assessment. This, coupled with emissions modeling, is set to provide the overall TERA tool for LNG technology selection.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleRisk Analysis of Gas Turbines for Natural Gas Liquefaction
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume133
    journal issue7
    journal titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4002673
    journal fristpage71704
    identifier eissn0742-4795
    keywordsEngines
    keywordsGas turbines
    keywordsRisk analysis
    keywordsFailure AND Temperature
    treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2011:;volume( 133 ):;issue: 007
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian