Show simple item record

contributor authorRaja S. R. Khan
contributor authorIan Bennett
contributor authorMaria C. Lagana
contributor authorStephen O. T. Ogaji
contributor authorPericles Pilidis
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:43:36Z
date available2017-05-09T00:43:36Z
date copyrightJuly, 2011
date issued2011
identifier issn1528-8919
identifier otherJETPEZ-27168#071704_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/145991
description abstractProcurement of process plant equipment involves decisions based not only on an economic agenda but also on long term plant capability, which in turn depends on equipment reliability. As the greater global community raises environmental concerns and pushes for economic reform, a tool is evermore required for a specific and critical selection of plant equipment. Risk assessments based on NASA’s Technology Readiness Level (TRL) scale have been employed in many previous risk models to map technology in terms of risk and reliability. The authors envisage a scale for quantifying the technical risk. The focus of this paper is the technical risk assessment of gas turbines as mechanical drivers for producing liquefied natural gas (LNG). This risk assessment is a cornerstone of the technoeconomic environmental and risk analysis (TERA) philosophy developed by Cranfield University’s Department of Power and Propulsion in U.K. Monte Carlo simulations are used in order to compare the risks of introducing new plant equipment against existing and established plant equipment. Three scenarios are investigated using an 87MW single spool, typical industrial machine, a baseline engine followed by an engine with increased firing temperature, and finally an engine with a zero staged compressor. The results suggest that if the baseline engine was to be upgraded, then the zero staging option would be a better solution than increasing the firing temperature since zero staging gives the lower rise in total time to repair (TTTR) or downtime. The authors suggest a scaling system based on NASA’s TRL but with modified definition criteria for the separate technology readiness levels in order to better relate the scale to gas turbine technology. The intention is to link the modified TRL to downtime, since downtime has been identified as a quantitative measure of technical risk. Latest developments of the modeling are looking at integrating risk analysis and a maintenance cost and scheduling model to provide a platform for total risk assessment. This, coupled with emissions modeling, is set to provide the overall TERA tool for LNG technology selection.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleRisk Analysis of Gas Turbines for Natural Gas Liquefaction
typeJournal Paper
journal volume133
journal issue7
journal titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
identifier doi10.1115/1.4002673
journal fristpage71704
identifier eissn0742-4795
keywordsEngines
keywordsGas turbines
keywordsRisk analysis
keywordsFailure AND Temperature
treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2011:;volume( 133 ):;issue: 007
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record