YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Biomechanical Validation of Finite Element Models for Two Silicone Metacarpophalangeal Joint Implants

    Source: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2011:;volume( 133 ):;issue: 002::page 24501
    Author:
    A. I. Hussein
    ,
    J. C. Stranart
    ,
    S. A. Meguid
    ,
    E. R. Bogoch
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4003311
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Silicone implants are used for prosthetic arthroplasty of metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints severely damaged by rheumatoid arthritis. Different silicone elastomer MCP implant designs have been developed, including the Swanson and the NeuFlex implants. The goal of this study was to compare the in vitro mechanical behavior of Swanson and NeuFlex MCP joint implants. Three-dimensional (3D) finite element (FE) models of the silicone implants were modeled using the commercial software ANSYS and subjected to angular displacement from 0 deg to 90 deg. FE models were validated using mechanical tests of implants incrementally bent from 0 deg to 90 deg in a joint simulator. Swanson size 2 and 4 implants were compared with NeuFlex size 10 and 30 implants, respectively. Good agreement was observed throughout the range of motion for the flexion bending moment derived from 3D FE models and mechanical tests. From 30 deg to 90 deg, the Swanson 2 demonstrated a greater resistance to deformation than the NeuFlex 10 and required a greater bending moment for joint flexion. For larger implant sizes, the NeuFlex 30 had a steeper moment-displacement curve, but required a lower moment than the Swanson 4, due to implant preflexion. On average, the stress generated at the implant hinge from 30 deg to 90 deg was lower in the NeuFlex than in the Swanson. On average, starting from the neutral position of 30 deg for the preflexed NeuFlex implant, higher moments were required to extend the NeuFlex implants to 0 deg compared with the Swanson implants, which returned spontaneously to resting position. Implant toggling within the medullary canals was less in the NeuFlex than in the Swanson. The differential performance of these implants may be useful in implant selection based on the preoperative condition(s) of the joint and specific patient functional needs.
    keyword(s): Stress , Hinges , Finite element model , Mechanical testing , Silicones , Electrical resistance , Finite element analysis , Canals , Biomechanics , Displacement , Motion , Elastomers AND Deformation ,
    • Download: (585.2Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Biomechanical Validation of Finite Element Models for Two Silicone Metacarpophalangeal Joint Implants

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/145492
    Collections
    • Journal of Biomechanical Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorA. I. Hussein
    contributor authorJ. C. Stranart
    contributor authorS. A. Meguid
    contributor authorE. R. Bogoch
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:42:36Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:42:36Z
    date copyrightFebruary, 2011
    date issued2011
    identifier issn0148-0731
    identifier otherJBENDY-27194#024501_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/145492
    description abstractSilicone implants are used for prosthetic arthroplasty of metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints severely damaged by rheumatoid arthritis. Different silicone elastomer MCP implant designs have been developed, including the Swanson and the NeuFlex implants. The goal of this study was to compare the in vitro mechanical behavior of Swanson and NeuFlex MCP joint implants. Three-dimensional (3D) finite element (FE) models of the silicone implants were modeled using the commercial software ANSYS and subjected to angular displacement from 0 deg to 90 deg. FE models were validated using mechanical tests of implants incrementally bent from 0 deg to 90 deg in a joint simulator. Swanson size 2 and 4 implants were compared with NeuFlex size 10 and 30 implants, respectively. Good agreement was observed throughout the range of motion for the flexion bending moment derived from 3D FE models and mechanical tests. From 30 deg to 90 deg, the Swanson 2 demonstrated a greater resistance to deformation than the NeuFlex 10 and required a greater bending moment for joint flexion. For larger implant sizes, the NeuFlex 30 had a steeper moment-displacement curve, but required a lower moment than the Swanson 4, due to implant preflexion. On average, the stress generated at the implant hinge from 30 deg to 90 deg was lower in the NeuFlex than in the Swanson. On average, starting from the neutral position of 30 deg for the preflexed NeuFlex implant, higher moments were required to extend the NeuFlex implants to 0 deg compared with the Swanson implants, which returned spontaneously to resting position. Implant toggling within the medullary canals was less in the NeuFlex than in the Swanson. The differential performance of these implants may be useful in implant selection based on the preoperative condition(s) of the joint and specific patient functional needs.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleBiomechanical Validation of Finite Element Models for Two Silicone Metacarpophalangeal Joint Implants
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume133
    journal issue2
    journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4003311
    journal fristpage24501
    identifier eissn1528-8951
    keywordsStress
    keywordsHinges
    keywordsFinite element model
    keywordsMechanical testing
    keywordsSilicones
    keywordsElectrical resistance
    keywordsFinite element analysis
    keywordsCanals
    keywordsBiomechanics
    keywordsDisplacement
    keywordsMotion
    keywordsElastomers AND Deformation
    treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2011:;volume( 133 ):;issue: 002
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian