Show simple item record

contributor authorA. I. Hussein
contributor authorJ. C. Stranart
contributor authorS. A. Meguid
contributor authorE. R. Bogoch
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:42:36Z
date available2017-05-09T00:42:36Z
date copyrightFebruary, 2011
date issued2011
identifier issn0148-0731
identifier otherJBENDY-27194#024501_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/145492
description abstractSilicone implants are used for prosthetic arthroplasty of metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints severely damaged by rheumatoid arthritis. Different silicone elastomer MCP implant designs have been developed, including the Swanson and the NeuFlex implants. The goal of this study was to compare the in vitro mechanical behavior of Swanson and NeuFlex MCP joint implants. Three-dimensional (3D) finite element (FE) models of the silicone implants were modeled using the commercial software ANSYS and subjected to angular displacement from 0 deg to 90 deg. FE models were validated using mechanical tests of implants incrementally bent from 0 deg to 90 deg in a joint simulator. Swanson size 2 and 4 implants were compared with NeuFlex size 10 and 30 implants, respectively. Good agreement was observed throughout the range of motion for the flexion bending moment derived from 3D FE models and mechanical tests. From 30 deg to 90 deg, the Swanson 2 demonstrated a greater resistance to deformation than the NeuFlex 10 and required a greater bending moment for joint flexion. For larger implant sizes, the NeuFlex 30 had a steeper moment-displacement curve, but required a lower moment than the Swanson 4, due to implant preflexion. On average, the stress generated at the implant hinge from 30 deg to 90 deg was lower in the NeuFlex than in the Swanson. On average, starting from the neutral position of 30 deg for the preflexed NeuFlex implant, higher moments were required to extend the NeuFlex implants to 0 deg compared with the Swanson implants, which returned spontaneously to resting position. Implant toggling within the medullary canals was less in the NeuFlex than in the Swanson. The differential performance of these implants may be useful in implant selection based on the preoperative condition(s) of the joint and specific patient functional needs.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleBiomechanical Validation of Finite Element Models for Two Silicone Metacarpophalangeal Joint Implants
typeJournal Paper
journal volume133
journal issue2
journal titleJournal of Biomechanical Engineering
identifier doi10.1115/1.4003311
journal fristpage24501
identifier eissn1528-8951
keywordsStress
keywordsHinges
keywordsFinite element model
keywordsMechanical testing
keywordsSilicones
keywordsElectrical resistance
keywordsFinite element analysis
keywordsCanals
keywordsBiomechanics
keywordsDisplacement
keywordsMotion
keywordsElastomers AND Deformation
treeJournal of Biomechanical Engineering:;2011:;volume( 133 ):;issue: 002
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record