YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Mechanical Design
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Mechanical Design
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Modularity and Ease of Disassembly: Study of Electrical and Electronic Equipment

    Source: Journal of Mechanical Design:;2010:;volume( 132 ):;issue: 001::page 14502
    Author:
    Daniel Collado-Ruiz
    ,
    Salvador F. Capuz-Rizo
    DOI: 10.1115/1.4000641
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: A common recommendation when designing for disassembly is to develop more modular products. The common belief is that an increase in modularity will systematically reduce the time required in order to disassemble the product, reducing the cost of the process. This paper studies the statistical relationship between these two concepts by comparing 15 different electrical products. Modularity and disassembly performance are assessed by different indicators each and their correlation is analyzed. The results show that the aforementioned relationship cannot be statistically proven and, for some of the cases, even inverse correlation is found. Factors such as product structure or selected end-of-life strategy are more important than modularity in end-of-life performance. Systematic modularization can even result in products with a worse behavior: For most electrical equipment, generating modules from a functional or manufacturing point of view will most probably result in worse end-of-life performance. It is only for modules with very specific properties that performance can be guaranteed.
    • Download: (242.1Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Modularity and Ease of Disassembly: Study of Electrical and Electronic Equipment

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/144291
    Collections
    • Journal of Mechanical Design

    Show full item record

    contributor authorDaniel Collado-Ruiz
    contributor authorSalvador F. Capuz-Rizo
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:39:49Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:39:49Z
    date copyrightJanuary, 2010
    date issued2010
    identifier issn1050-0472
    identifier otherJMDEDB-27916#014502_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/144291
    description abstractA common recommendation when designing for disassembly is to develop more modular products. The common belief is that an increase in modularity will systematically reduce the time required in order to disassemble the product, reducing the cost of the process. This paper studies the statistical relationship between these two concepts by comparing 15 different electrical products. Modularity and disassembly performance are assessed by different indicators each and their correlation is analyzed. The results show that the aforementioned relationship cannot be statistically proven and, for some of the cases, even inverse correlation is found. Factors such as product structure or selected end-of-life strategy are more important than modularity in end-of-life performance. Systematic modularization can even result in products with a worse behavior: For most electrical equipment, generating modules from a functional or manufacturing point of view will most probably result in worse end-of-life performance. It is only for modules with very specific properties that performance can be guaranteed.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleModularity and Ease of Disassembly: Study of Electrical and Electronic Equipment
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume132
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Mechanical Design
    identifier doi10.1115/1.4000641
    journal fristpage14502
    identifier eissn1528-9001
    treeJournal of Mechanical Design:;2010:;volume( 132 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian