Show simple item record

contributor authorDaniel Collado-Ruiz
contributor authorSalvador F. Capuz-Rizo
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:39:49Z
date available2017-05-09T00:39:49Z
date copyrightJanuary, 2010
date issued2010
identifier issn1050-0472
identifier otherJMDEDB-27916#014502_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/144291
description abstractA common recommendation when designing for disassembly is to develop more modular products. The common belief is that an increase in modularity will systematically reduce the time required in order to disassemble the product, reducing the cost of the process. This paper studies the statistical relationship between these two concepts by comparing 15 different electrical products. Modularity and disassembly performance are assessed by different indicators each and their correlation is analyzed. The results show that the aforementioned relationship cannot be statistically proven and, for some of the cases, even inverse correlation is found. Factors such as product structure or selected end-of-life strategy are more important than modularity in end-of-life performance. Systematic modularization can even result in products with a worse behavior: For most electrical equipment, generating modules from a functional or manufacturing point of view will most probably result in worse end-of-life performance. It is only for modules with very specific properties that performance can be guaranteed.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleModularity and Ease of Disassembly: Study of Electrical and Electronic Equipment
typeJournal Paper
journal volume132
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Mechanical Design
identifier doi10.1115/1.4000641
journal fristpage14502
identifier eissn1528-9001
treeJournal of Mechanical Design:;2010:;volume( 132 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record