YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Minimizing Defects Between Adjacent Foils in Ultrasonically Consolidated Parts

    Source: Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology:;2010:;volume( 132 ):;issue: 001::page 11006
    Author:
    J. O. Obielodan
    ,
    D. G. Taggart
    ,
    G. D. Janaki Ram
    ,
    B. E. Stucker
    DOI: 10.1115/1.3184033
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: Two types of defects normally occur in ultrasonically consolidated parts: (i) Defects that occur between mating foils in successive layers (“type 1” defects) and (ii) defects that occur within a layer between two foils laid side-by-side (“type 2” defects). While some success has been achieved in minimizing type 1 defects, type 2 defects, however, have been given very little attention. Both types of defects are undesirable and should be minimized if ultrasonically consolidated parts are to be used in structural applications. This work describes an investigation of how to minimize type 2 defects in ultrasonically consolidated parts. According to our hypothesis, a foil being deposited must overlap the adjacent deposited foil by an optimum amount to ensure a defect-free joint between the two foils. Transverse tensile specimens were fabricated with various amounts of foil overlap (by changing the foil width setting) to test this hypothesis. Metallographic and fractographic studies showed a clear correlation between foil overlap, defect incidence, and tensile strength. It was found that a foil width setting of 23.81 mm helps minimize type 2 defects in ultrasonically consolidated Al 3003 parts using standard foils of 23.88 mm (equivalent to 0.94 in.) nominal width.
    keyword(s): Product quality , Manufacturing , Fracture (Process) AND Tensile strength ,
    • Download: (1.192Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      Minimizing Defects Between Adjacent Foils in Ultrasonically Consolidated Parts

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/143370
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology

    Show full item record

    contributor authorJ. O. Obielodan
    contributor authorD. G. Taggart
    contributor authorG. D. Janaki Ram
    contributor authorB. E. Stucker
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:38:00Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:38:00Z
    date copyrightJanuary, 2010
    date issued2010
    identifier issn0094-4289
    identifier otherJEMTA8-27124#011006_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/143370
    description abstractTwo types of defects normally occur in ultrasonically consolidated parts: (i) Defects that occur between mating foils in successive layers (“type 1” defects) and (ii) defects that occur within a layer between two foils laid side-by-side (“type 2” defects). While some success has been achieved in minimizing type 1 defects, type 2 defects, however, have been given very little attention. Both types of defects are undesirable and should be minimized if ultrasonically consolidated parts are to be used in structural applications. This work describes an investigation of how to minimize type 2 defects in ultrasonically consolidated parts. According to our hypothesis, a foil being deposited must overlap the adjacent deposited foil by an optimum amount to ensure a defect-free joint between the two foils. Transverse tensile specimens were fabricated with various amounts of foil overlap (by changing the foil width setting) to test this hypothesis. Metallographic and fractographic studies showed a clear correlation between foil overlap, defect incidence, and tensile strength. It was found that a foil width setting of 23.81 mm helps minimize type 2 defects in ultrasonically consolidated Al 3003 parts using standard foils of 23.88 mm (equivalent to 0.94 in.) nominal width.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleMinimizing Defects Between Adjacent Foils in Ultrasonically Consolidated Parts
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume132
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Engineering Materials and Technology
    identifier doi10.1115/1.3184033
    journal fristpage11006
    identifier eissn1528-8889
    keywordsProduct quality
    keywordsManufacturing
    keywordsFracture (Process) AND Tensile strength
    treeJournal of Engineering Materials and Technology:;2010:;volume( 132 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian