Show simple item record

contributor authorJ. O. Obielodan
contributor authorD. G. Taggart
contributor authorG. D. Janaki Ram
contributor authorB. E. Stucker
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:38:00Z
date available2017-05-09T00:38:00Z
date copyrightJanuary, 2010
date issued2010
identifier issn0094-4289
identifier otherJEMTA8-27124#011006_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/143370
description abstractTwo types of defects normally occur in ultrasonically consolidated parts: (i) Defects that occur between mating foils in successive layers (“type 1” defects) and (ii) defects that occur within a layer between two foils laid side-by-side (“type 2” defects). While some success has been achieved in minimizing type 1 defects, type 2 defects, however, have been given very little attention. Both types of defects are undesirable and should be minimized if ultrasonically consolidated parts are to be used in structural applications. This work describes an investigation of how to minimize type 2 defects in ultrasonically consolidated parts. According to our hypothesis, a foil being deposited must overlap the adjacent deposited foil by an optimum amount to ensure a defect-free joint between the two foils. Transverse tensile specimens were fabricated with various amounts of foil overlap (by changing the foil width setting) to test this hypothesis. Metallographic and fractographic studies showed a clear correlation between foil overlap, defect incidence, and tensile strength. It was found that a foil width setting of 23.81 mm helps minimize type 2 defects in ultrasonically consolidated Al 3003 parts using standard foils of 23.88 mm (equivalent to 0.94 in.) nominal width.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleMinimizing Defects Between Adjacent Foils in Ultrasonically Consolidated Parts
typeJournal Paper
journal volume132
journal issue1
journal titleJournal of Engineering Materials and Technology
identifier doi10.1115/1.3184033
journal fristpage11006
identifier eissn1528-8889
keywordsProduct quality
keywordsManufacturing
keywordsFracture (Process) AND Tensile strength
treeJournal of Engineering Materials and Technology:;2010:;volume( 132 ):;issue: 001
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record