Spray Cooling With Ammonia on Microstructured Surfaces: Performance Enhancement and Hysteresis EffectSource: Journal of Heat Transfer:;2009:;volume( 131 ):;issue: 007::page 71401DOI: 10.1115/1.3089553Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
Abstract: Experiments were performed to investigate spray cooling on microstructured surfaces. Surface modification techniques were utilized to obtain microscale indentations and protrusions on the heater surfaces. A smooth surface was also tested to have baseline data for comparison. Tests were conducted in a closed loop system with ammonia using RTI’s vapor atomized spray nozzles. Thick film resistors, simulating heat source, were mounted onto 1×2 cm2 heaters, and heat fluxes up to 500 W/cm2 (well below critical heat flux limit) were removed. Two nozzles each spraying 1 cm2 of the heater area used 96 ml/cm2 min(9.7 gal/in.2 h) liquid and 13.8 ml/cm2 s(11.3 ft3/in.2 h) vapor flow rate with only 48 kPa (7 psi) pressure drop. Comparison of cooling curves in the form of surface superheat (ΔTsat=Tsurf−Tsat) versus heat flux in the heating-up and cooling-down modes (for increasing and decreasing heat flux conditions) demonstrated substantial performance enhancement for both microstructured surfaces over smooth surface. At 500 W/cm2, the increases in the heat transfer coefficient for microstructured surfaces with protrusions and indentations were 112% and 49% over smooth surface, respectively. Moreover, results showed that smooth surface gives nearly identical cooling curves in the heating-up and cooling-down modes, while microstructured surfaces experience a hysteresis phenomenon depending on the surface roughness level and yields lower surface superheat in the cooling-down mode, compared with the heating-up mode, at a given heat flux. Microstructured surface with protrusions was further tested using two approaches to gain better understanding on hysteresis. Data indicated that microstructured surface helps retain the established three-phase contact lines, the regions where solid, liquid, and vapor phases meet, resulting in consistent cooling curve and hysteresis effect at varying heat flux conditions (as low as 25 W/cm2 for the present work). Data also confirmed a direct connection between hysteresis and thermal history of the heater.
keyword(s): Cooling , Sprays , Heating , Heat flux , Nozzles , Vapors , Heat , Temperature AND Flow (Dynamics) ,
|
Collections
Show full item record
| contributor author | Huseyin Bostanci | |
| contributor author | John P. Kizito | |
| contributor author | Louis C. Chow | |
| contributor author | Daniel P. Rini | |
| date accessioned | 2017-05-09T00:33:44Z | |
| date available | 2017-05-09T00:33:44Z | |
| date copyright | July, 2009 | |
| date issued | 2009 | |
| identifier issn | 0022-1481 | |
| identifier other | JHTRAO-27865#071401_1.pdf | |
| identifier uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/141019 | |
| description abstract | Experiments were performed to investigate spray cooling on microstructured surfaces. Surface modification techniques were utilized to obtain microscale indentations and protrusions on the heater surfaces. A smooth surface was also tested to have baseline data for comparison. Tests were conducted in a closed loop system with ammonia using RTI’s vapor atomized spray nozzles. Thick film resistors, simulating heat source, were mounted onto 1×2 cm2 heaters, and heat fluxes up to 500 W/cm2 (well below critical heat flux limit) were removed. Two nozzles each spraying 1 cm2 of the heater area used 96 ml/cm2 min(9.7 gal/in.2 h) liquid and 13.8 ml/cm2 s(11.3 ft3/in.2 h) vapor flow rate with only 48 kPa (7 psi) pressure drop. Comparison of cooling curves in the form of surface superheat (ΔTsat=Tsurf−Tsat) versus heat flux in the heating-up and cooling-down modes (for increasing and decreasing heat flux conditions) demonstrated substantial performance enhancement for both microstructured surfaces over smooth surface. At 500 W/cm2, the increases in the heat transfer coefficient for microstructured surfaces with protrusions and indentations were 112% and 49% over smooth surface, respectively. Moreover, results showed that smooth surface gives nearly identical cooling curves in the heating-up and cooling-down modes, while microstructured surfaces experience a hysteresis phenomenon depending on the surface roughness level and yields lower surface superheat in the cooling-down mode, compared with the heating-up mode, at a given heat flux. Microstructured surface with protrusions was further tested using two approaches to gain better understanding on hysteresis. Data indicated that microstructured surface helps retain the established three-phase contact lines, the regions where solid, liquid, and vapor phases meet, resulting in consistent cooling curve and hysteresis effect at varying heat flux conditions (as low as 25 W/cm2 for the present work). Data also confirmed a direct connection between hysteresis and thermal history of the heater. | |
| publisher | The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) | |
| title | Spray Cooling With Ammonia on Microstructured Surfaces: Performance Enhancement and Hysteresis Effect | |
| type | Journal Paper | |
| journal volume | 131 | |
| journal issue | 7 | |
| journal title | Journal of Heat Transfer | |
| identifier doi | 10.1115/1.3089553 | |
| journal fristpage | 71401 | |
| identifier eissn | 1528-8943 | |
| keywords | Cooling | |
| keywords | Sprays | |
| keywords | Heating | |
| keywords | Heat flux | |
| keywords | Nozzles | |
| keywords | Vapors | |
| keywords | Heat | |
| keywords | Temperature AND Flow (Dynamics) | |
| tree | Journal of Heat Transfer:;2009:;volume( 131 ):;issue: 007 | |
| contenttype | Fulltext |