Show simple item record

contributor authorHuseyin Bostanci
contributor authorJohn P. Kizito
contributor authorLouis C. Chow
contributor authorDaniel P. Rini
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:33:44Z
date available2017-05-09T00:33:44Z
date copyrightJuly, 2009
date issued2009
identifier issn0022-1481
identifier otherJHTRAO-27865#071401_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/141019
description abstractExperiments were performed to investigate spray cooling on microstructured surfaces. Surface modification techniques were utilized to obtain microscale indentations and protrusions on the heater surfaces. A smooth surface was also tested to have baseline data for comparison. Tests were conducted in a closed loop system with ammonia using RTI’s vapor atomized spray nozzles. Thick film resistors, simulating heat source, were mounted onto 1×2 cm2 heaters, and heat fluxes up to 500 W/cm2 (well below critical heat flux limit) were removed. Two nozzles each spraying 1 cm2 of the heater area used 96 ml/cm2 min(9.7 gal/in.2 h) liquid and 13.8 ml/cm2 s(11.3 ft3/in.2 h) vapor flow rate with only 48 kPa (7 psi) pressure drop. Comparison of cooling curves in the form of surface superheat (ΔTsat=Tsurf−Tsat) versus heat flux in the heating-up and cooling-down modes (for increasing and decreasing heat flux conditions) demonstrated substantial performance enhancement for both microstructured surfaces over smooth surface. At 500 W/cm2, the increases in the heat transfer coefficient for microstructured surfaces with protrusions and indentations were 112% and 49% over smooth surface, respectively. Moreover, results showed that smooth surface gives nearly identical cooling curves in the heating-up and cooling-down modes, while microstructured surfaces experience a hysteresis phenomenon depending on the surface roughness level and yields lower surface superheat in the cooling-down mode, compared with the heating-up mode, at a given heat flux. Microstructured surface with protrusions was further tested using two approaches to gain better understanding on hysteresis. Data indicated that microstructured surface helps retain the established three-phase contact lines, the regions where solid, liquid, and vapor phases meet, resulting in consistent cooling curve and hysteresis effect at varying heat flux conditions (as low as 25 W/cm2 for the present work). Data also confirmed a direct connection between hysteresis and thermal history of the heater.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleSpray Cooling With Ammonia on Microstructured Surfaces: Performance Enhancement and Hysteresis Effect
typeJournal Paper
journal volume131
journal issue7
journal titleJournal of Heat Transfer
identifier doi10.1115/1.3089553
journal fristpage71401
identifier eissn1528-8943
keywordsCooling
keywordsSprays
keywordsHeating
keywordsHeat flux
keywordsNozzles
keywordsVapors
keywordsHeat
keywordsTemperature AND Flow (Dynamics)
treeJournal of Heat Transfer:;2009:;volume( 131 ):;issue: 007
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record