YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASME
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    A Comparative Study of Different Methods of Using Animal Fat as a Fuel in a Compression Ignition Engine

    Source: Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2006:;volume( 128 ):;issue: 004::page 907
    Author:
    M. Senthil Kumar
    ,
    A. Kerihuel
    ,
    J. Bellettre
    ,
    M. Tazerout
    DOI: 10.1115/1.2180278
    Publisher: The American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    Abstract: This work explores a comparative study of different methods of using animal fat as a fuel in a compression ignition engine. A single-cylinder air-cooled, direct-injection diesel engine is used to test the fuels at 100% and 60% of the maximum engine power output conditions. Initially, animal fat is tested as fuel at normal temperature. Then, it is preheated to 70°C and used as fuel. Finally, animal fat is converted into methanol and ethanol emulsions using water and tested as fuel. A drop in cylinder peak pressure, longer ignition delay, and a lower premixed combustion rate are observed with neat animal fat as compared to neat diesel. With fat preheating and emulsions, there is an improvement in cylinder peak pressure and maximum rate of pressure rise. Ignition delay becomes longer with both the emulsions as compared to neat fats. However, preheating shows shorter ignition delay. Improvement in heat release rates is achieved with all the methods as compared to neat fats. At normal temperature, neat animal fat results in higher specific energy consumption and exhaust gas temperature as compared to neat diesel at both power outputs. Preheating and emulsions of animal fat show improvement in performance as compared to neat fat. Smoke is lower with neat fat as compared to neat diesel. It reduces further with all the methods. At peak power output, the smoke level is found as 0.89m−1 with methanol, 0.28m−1 with ethanol emulsions, and 1.7m−1 with fat preheating, whereas it is 3.7m−1 with neat fat and 6.3m−1 with neat diesel. Methanol and ethanol emulsions significantly reduce NO emissions due to the vaporization of water and alcohols. However, NO increases with fat preheating due to high in-cylinder temperature. Higher unburned hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide emissions are found with neat fat as compared to neat diesel at both power outputs. However, these emissions are considerably reduced with all the methods. It is finally concluded that adopting emulsification with the animal fat can lead to a reduction in emissions and an improvement in combustion characteristics of a diesel engine.
    keyword(s): Temperature , Combustion , Fuels , Engines , Diesel , Diesel engines , Emulsions , Ethanol , Methanol , Emissions , Pressure , Cylinders , Heat , Water , Delays , Ignition , Smoke AND Exhaust systems ,
    • Download: (1.585Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Statistics

      A Comparative Study of Different Methods of Using Animal Fat as a Fuel in a Compression Ignition Engine

    URI
    https://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/133641
    Collections
    • Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power

    Show full item record

    contributor authorM. Senthil Kumar
    contributor authorA. Kerihuel
    contributor authorJ. Bellettre
    contributor authorM. Tazerout
    date accessioned2017-05-09T00:19:46Z
    date available2017-05-09T00:19:46Z
    date copyrightOctober, 2006
    date issued2006
    identifier issn1528-8919
    identifier otherJETPEZ-26926#907_1.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/133641
    description abstractThis work explores a comparative study of different methods of using animal fat as a fuel in a compression ignition engine. A single-cylinder air-cooled, direct-injection diesel engine is used to test the fuels at 100% and 60% of the maximum engine power output conditions. Initially, animal fat is tested as fuel at normal temperature. Then, it is preheated to 70°C and used as fuel. Finally, animal fat is converted into methanol and ethanol emulsions using water and tested as fuel. A drop in cylinder peak pressure, longer ignition delay, and a lower premixed combustion rate are observed with neat animal fat as compared to neat diesel. With fat preheating and emulsions, there is an improvement in cylinder peak pressure and maximum rate of pressure rise. Ignition delay becomes longer with both the emulsions as compared to neat fats. However, preheating shows shorter ignition delay. Improvement in heat release rates is achieved with all the methods as compared to neat fats. At normal temperature, neat animal fat results in higher specific energy consumption and exhaust gas temperature as compared to neat diesel at both power outputs. Preheating and emulsions of animal fat show improvement in performance as compared to neat fat. Smoke is lower with neat fat as compared to neat diesel. It reduces further with all the methods. At peak power output, the smoke level is found as 0.89m−1 with methanol, 0.28m−1 with ethanol emulsions, and 1.7m−1 with fat preheating, whereas it is 3.7m−1 with neat fat and 6.3m−1 with neat diesel. Methanol and ethanol emulsions significantly reduce NO emissions due to the vaporization of water and alcohols. However, NO increases with fat preheating due to high in-cylinder temperature. Higher unburned hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide emissions are found with neat fat as compared to neat diesel at both power outputs. However, these emissions are considerably reduced with all the methods. It is finally concluded that adopting emulsification with the animal fat can lead to a reduction in emissions and an improvement in combustion characteristics of a diesel engine.
    publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
    titleA Comparative Study of Different Methods of Using Animal Fat as a Fuel in a Compression Ignition Engine
    typeJournal Paper
    journal volume128
    journal issue4
    journal titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
    identifier doi10.1115/1.2180278
    journal fristpage907
    journal lastpage914
    identifier eissn0742-4795
    keywordsTemperature
    keywordsCombustion
    keywordsFuels
    keywordsEngines
    keywordsDiesel
    keywordsDiesel engines
    keywordsEmulsions
    keywordsEthanol
    keywordsMethanol
    keywordsEmissions
    keywordsPressure
    keywordsCylinders
    keywordsHeat
    keywordsWater
    keywordsDelays
    keywordsIgnition
    keywordsSmoke AND Exhaust systems
    treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2006:;volume( 128 ):;issue: 004
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian