Show simple item record

contributor authorM. Senthil Kumar
contributor authorA. Kerihuel
contributor authorJ. Bellettre
contributor authorM. Tazerout
date accessioned2017-05-09T00:19:46Z
date available2017-05-09T00:19:46Z
date copyrightOctober, 2006
date issued2006
identifier issn1528-8919
identifier otherJETPEZ-26926#907_1.pdf
identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/133641
description abstractThis work explores a comparative study of different methods of using animal fat as a fuel in a compression ignition engine. A single-cylinder air-cooled, direct-injection diesel engine is used to test the fuels at 100% and 60% of the maximum engine power output conditions. Initially, animal fat is tested as fuel at normal temperature. Then, it is preheated to 70°C and used as fuel. Finally, animal fat is converted into methanol and ethanol emulsions using water and tested as fuel. A drop in cylinder peak pressure, longer ignition delay, and a lower premixed combustion rate are observed with neat animal fat as compared to neat diesel. With fat preheating and emulsions, there is an improvement in cylinder peak pressure and maximum rate of pressure rise. Ignition delay becomes longer with both the emulsions as compared to neat fats. However, preheating shows shorter ignition delay. Improvement in heat release rates is achieved with all the methods as compared to neat fats. At normal temperature, neat animal fat results in higher specific energy consumption and exhaust gas temperature as compared to neat diesel at both power outputs. Preheating and emulsions of animal fat show improvement in performance as compared to neat fat. Smoke is lower with neat fat as compared to neat diesel. It reduces further with all the methods. At peak power output, the smoke level is found as 0.89m−1 with methanol, 0.28m−1 with ethanol emulsions, and 1.7m−1 with fat preheating, whereas it is 3.7m−1 with neat fat and 6.3m−1 with neat diesel. Methanol and ethanol emulsions significantly reduce NO emissions due to the vaporization of water and alcohols. However, NO increases with fat preheating due to high in-cylinder temperature. Higher unburned hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide emissions are found with neat fat as compared to neat diesel at both power outputs. However, these emissions are considerably reduced with all the methods. It is finally concluded that adopting emulsification with the animal fat can lead to a reduction in emissions and an improvement in combustion characteristics of a diesel engine.
publisherThe American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)
titleA Comparative Study of Different Methods of Using Animal Fat as a Fuel in a Compression Ignition Engine
typeJournal Paper
journal volume128
journal issue4
journal titleJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power
identifier doi10.1115/1.2180278
journal fristpage907
journal lastpage914
identifier eissn0742-4795
keywordsTemperature
keywordsCombustion
keywordsFuels
keywordsEngines
keywordsDiesel
keywordsDiesel engines
keywordsEmulsions
keywordsEthanol
keywordsMethanol
keywordsEmissions
keywordsPressure
keywordsCylinders
keywordsHeat
keywordsWater
keywordsDelays
keywordsIgnition
keywordsSmoke AND Exhaust systems
treeJournal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power:;2006:;volume( 128 ):;issue: 004
contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record