| dc.contributor.author | Kevin K. Wolka | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2017-05-08T21:29:32Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2017-05-08T21:29:32Z | |
| dc.date.copyright | April 1997 | |
| dc.date.issued | 1997 | |
| dc.identifier.other | %28asce%291090-025x%281997%291%3A2%2847%29.pdf | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl/handle/yetl/53525 | |
| dc.description.abstract | A proposed site-specific benefit-cost analysis methodology for use in remedy selection for environmental remediation projects is analyzed. Benefits, costs, and benefit-cost analysis are defined in the context of environmental remediation. Difficulties in determining and maximizing the benefit-cost ratio are addressed. A case study of a manufacturing facility contaminated with volatile organic compounds is presented with the actual results using the current feasibility study method for remedy selection. A comparison of these results with the results of a site-specific benefit-cost analysis is made. The comparison shows a similar selected remedy, ground-water monitoring with institutional controls, for both analysis methods. | |
| dc.publisher | American Society of Civil Engineers | |
| dc.title | Emerging Ideas: Site-Specific Benefit-Cost Analysis for Environmental Remediation Projects | |
| dc.type | Journal Paper | |
| dc.journal.volume | 1 | |
| dc.journal.issue | 2 | |
| dc.journal.title | Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management | |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1061/(ASCE)1090-025X(1997)1:2(47) | |
| dc.tree | Practice Periodical of Hazardous, Toxic, and Radioactive Waste Management:;1997:;Volume ( 001 ):;issue: 002 | |
| dc.contenttype | Fulltext | |