• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • ASME Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • ASME Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Comparison of Proper Orthogonal Decomposition and Auto-Encoder as Reduced-Order Models for Reconstruction and Prediction of Turbine Blade Temperature Field With Sparse Data

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    ht_147_07_073801.pdf (3.547Mb)
    Date
    2025
    Author
    Zhang, Yimin
    Mi, Jin
    Tong, Zi-Xiang
    Qiu, Lu
    Zhu, Jianqin
    Li, Dike
    Cheng, Zeyuan
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Accurately reconstructing and predicting the global temperature field of turbine blades is of significant importance in the field of aero-engines. The complexities in geometries and operation conditions of the blades further complicate these problems, because temperatures can only be acquired from sparse and noisy measurements. Proper orthogonal decomposition (POD) and deep neural network auto-encoder (AE) are two typical reduced-order models to reconstruct the global temperature fields from sparse data points, and they are further combined with long short-term memory (LSTM) networks for prediction. In contrast with the linear modes of POD, the nonlinear features of AE may lead to advantages in reconstructing and predicting of temperature fields. A systematic comparison between the two methods is seldom studied in existing research, particularly regarding their noise resistance and time-series prediction capabilities. Therefore, a detailed study is conducted in this paper. The two-dimensional cross section of Mark II blades is used as an example; this work compares the performance of POD–LSTM and AE–LSTM in reconstructing and predicting the global temperature field of turbine blades based on sparse and noisy measurement data under transient operating conditions. The results indicate that both reduced-order prediction models achieved low mean absolute percentage errors (MAPEs) and high computational efficiency for reconstruction and prediction. With 12 sparse data points, the reconstruction error of two methods is comparable. Compared to the POD method, reduction coefficients of the AE method are more robust and have a uniform energy distribution, so AE exhibits superior noise resistance and time-series prediction capabilities.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4308664
    Collections
    • ASME Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV