• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology, Part B: Subsurface Energy and Carbon Capture
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASME
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology, Part B: Subsurface Energy and Carbon Capture
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Impact of Production Strategy on Production Forecasting, Energy Demand, and Carbon Emissions: Typical Case Study of the Brazilian Presalt

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    jertb-24-1023.pdf (1.057Mb)
    Date
    2025
    Author
    Hohendorff Filho, J. C. V.
    Bannwart, A. C.
    Estevam, V.
    Castro, M. S.
    Schiozer, D. J.
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    This study evaluates how the production strategy influences the main decision-making indicators in the development of the production of a Brazilian presalt field, considering reservoir and production system models integrated into a single simulation. The general methodology involves the evaluation of alternative production strategies for a case study related to a production development project, from the point of view of reservoirs for the water injection recovery mechanism. Variables with a focus on the reservoir, production, and primary processing of fluids are included. Sensitivity analyses based on the methodology of the response surface of parameters and variables are performed in relation to oil recovery, financial return, energy demand, and carbon emission. Production and fluid injection curves are compared. The integrated modeling (reservoir, well, and processing) was important to evaluate the impact of the selection of the design and management variables of the integrated production strategy, showing the interdependence between the simulated models. The first-order analysis of the uncertain reservoir parameters observed a significant impact on the indicators of field recovery (up to 11%) and financial return (up to 13%), and a lower impact on energy demand (up to 7%), carbon emissions (up to 6%), and oil production per CO2 emitted (up to 4%). The design and management variables of the field (platform capacity, number of producer and injector wells, separation operating pressure, and maintenance pressure in the reservoir), including those related to the production system (platform process plant alternatives for gas recycling, gas turbine-driven compressors, primary separator operating pressure, and production control of the wells to limit CO2 emission) have a significant impact on the indicators of financial return (up to 10% without CO2 emission tax rate, up to 12% with emission tax rate), energy demand (up to 17%), carbon emissions (up to 15%), and oil production per CO2 emitted (up to 15%), with less impact on field recovery (up to 11%). The study quantifies the impact of production strategy variables in an integrated way, especially those related to the production system. This assessment is important for production forecasting and decision-making support on energy demand and greenhouse gas emissions from oil and gas production and processing.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4306388
    Collections
    • Journal of Energy Resources Technology, Part B: Subsurface Energy and Carbon Capture

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV