Comparative Analysis of Bursting Pressure Prediction Methods for Steam Generator Tube With Volume Defect

Abstract

This paper compares the difference and accuracy of bursting pressure prediction based on the flow stress σf prediction method, plastic collapse prediction method, and ductile damage model prediction method in Inconel 690 steam generator tube (SGT) with volume defect. The tensile and smooth tube bursting tests determine the parameters required for the three prediction methods. The three methods predict the bursting pressures for four deep volume defects in SGT. The results are compared and analyzed with the experimental data. The results show that the ductile damage model prediction method is the best to predict the SGT bursting pressure error with volume defects simulating the structure's deformation and damage failure process.