• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Quantitative Assessment of the Architect’s Role under US Standard Construction Contracts: A Graph Theory Approach

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    JMENEA.MEENG-6072.pdf (1.820Mb)
    Date
    2024
    Author
    Mariam Elazhary
    Ahmed Shiha
    Islam H. El-adaway
    Sammi Young
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Evaluating the architect’s role in construction contracts is vital for improving the contractual relationship and preventing disputes. Standard contracts define the architect as an owner’s agent and/or a contract administrator. Studies often use qualitative and subjective evaluations to analyze the architect’s role. However, there is a lack of quantitative measures that objectively evaluate the architect’s capacities in construction contracts. This paper fills this knowledge gap. This study proposes a quantitative graph theory-based approach to analyze the architect’s roles under three standard forms of construction contracts in the US: (1) extracting and classifying party interactions; (2) modeling the interactions using network analysis; (3) conducting an expert-based survey to determine the importance of the interactions; and (4) developing the architect’s-capacity score (ACS) as an index that depicts the architect’s roles into one interpretable measure. The calculated ACS established the American Institute of Architects (AIA) at the upper end of the spectrum followed by the Engineers Joint Contract Documents Committee contract and then finally the ConsensusDocs with the lowest score. Such delineates the architect’s presence under the AIA contract as both an owner’s agent as well as a contract’s administrator. The EJCDC contract processes reflected the architect’s role to be more of an owner’s agent. Finally, the ConsensusDocs represented the lowest score due to the lack of the architect’s presence in most contract processes. This study contributes to the body of knowledge by providing a methodological approach that mediates the subjectivity entailed in the evaluation of the architect’s role: one quantifiable measure. Similarly, Utilizing ACS enables project parties to customize the architect’s involvement in the construction phase through tailored contractual arrangements. This quantification of the architect’s role promotes a clearer understanding of the architect’s expectations, fostering enhanced communication and trust.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4299418
    Collections
    • Journal of Management in Engineering

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV