YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Management in Engineering
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Quantitative Assessment of the Architect’s Role under US Standard Construction Contracts: A Graph Theory Approach

    Source: Journal of Management in Engineering:;2024:;Volume ( 040 ):;issue: 005::page 04024031-1
    Author:
    Mariam Elazhary
    ,
    Ahmed Shiha
    ,
    Islam H. El-adaway
    ,
    Sammi Young
    DOI: 10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-6072
    Publisher: American Society of Civil Engineers
    Abstract: Evaluating the architect’s role in construction contracts is vital for improving the contractual relationship and preventing disputes. Standard contracts define the architect as an owner’s agent and/or a contract administrator. Studies often use qualitative and subjective evaluations to analyze the architect’s role. However, there is a lack of quantitative measures that objectively evaluate the architect’s capacities in construction contracts. This paper fills this knowledge gap. This study proposes a quantitative graph theory-based approach to analyze the architect’s roles under three standard forms of construction contracts in the US: (1) extracting and classifying party interactions; (2) modeling the interactions using network analysis; (3) conducting an expert-based survey to determine the importance of the interactions; and (4) developing the architect’s-capacity score (ACS) as an index that depicts the architect’s roles into one interpretable measure. The calculated ACS established the American Institute of Architects (AIA) at the upper end of the spectrum followed by the Engineers Joint Contract Documents Committee contract and then finally the ConsensusDocs with the lowest score. Such delineates the architect’s presence under the AIA contract as both an owner’s agent as well as a contract’s administrator. The EJCDC contract processes reflected the architect’s role to be more of an owner’s agent. Finally, the ConsensusDocs represented the lowest score due to the lack of the architect’s presence in most contract processes. This study contributes to the body of knowledge by providing a methodological approach that mediates the subjectivity entailed in the evaluation of the architect’s role: one quantifiable measure. Similarly, Utilizing ACS enables project parties to customize the architect’s involvement in the construction phase through tailored contractual arrangements. This quantification of the architect’s role promotes a clearer understanding of the architect’s expectations, fostering enhanced communication and trust.
    • Download: (1.820Mb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Quantitative Assessment of the Architect’s Role under US Standard Construction Contracts: A Graph Theory Approach

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4299418
    Collections
    • Journal of Management in Engineering

    Show full item record

    contributor authorMariam Elazhary
    contributor authorAhmed Shiha
    contributor authorIslam H. El-adaway
    contributor authorSammi Young
    date accessioned2024-12-24T10:42:56Z
    date available2024-12-24T10:42:56Z
    date copyright9/1/2024 12:00:00 AM
    date issued2024
    identifier otherJMENEA.MEENG-6072.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4299418
    description abstractEvaluating the architect’s role in construction contracts is vital for improving the contractual relationship and preventing disputes. Standard contracts define the architect as an owner’s agent and/or a contract administrator. Studies often use qualitative and subjective evaluations to analyze the architect’s role. However, there is a lack of quantitative measures that objectively evaluate the architect’s capacities in construction contracts. This paper fills this knowledge gap. This study proposes a quantitative graph theory-based approach to analyze the architect’s roles under three standard forms of construction contracts in the US: (1) extracting and classifying party interactions; (2) modeling the interactions using network analysis; (3) conducting an expert-based survey to determine the importance of the interactions; and (4) developing the architect’s-capacity score (ACS) as an index that depicts the architect’s roles into one interpretable measure. The calculated ACS established the American Institute of Architects (AIA) at the upper end of the spectrum followed by the Engineers Joint Contract Documents Committee contract and then finally the ConsensusDocs with the lowest score. Such delineates the architect’s presence under the AIA contract as both an owner’s agent as well as a contract’s administrator. The EJCDC contract processes reflected the architect’s role to be more of an owner’s agent. Finally, the ConsensusDocs represented the lowest score due to the lack of the architect’s presence in most contract processes. This study contributes to the body of knowledge by providing a methodological approach that mediates the subjectivity entailed in the evaluation of the architect’s role: one quantifiable measure. Similarly, Utilizing ACS enables project parties to customize the architect’s involvement in the construction phase through tailored contractual arrangements. This quantification of the architect’s role promotes a clearer understanding of the architect’s expectations, fostering enhanced communication and trust.
    publisherAmerican Society of Civil Engineers
    titleQuantitative Assessment of the Architect’s Role under US Standard Construction Contracts: A Graph Theory Approach
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume40
    journal issue5
    journal titleJournal of Management in Engineering
    identifier doi10.1061/JMENEA.MEENG-6072
    journal fristpage04024031-1
    journal lastpage04024031-16
    page16
    treeJournal of Management in Engineering:;2024:;Volume ( 040 ):;issue: 005
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian