• Login
    View Item 
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    • View Item
    •   DSpace Home
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Conceptual Cross-Theoretical Assessment Model for Practitioners’ Compliance Behavior with Building Energy Codes

    Thumbnail
    View/Open
    10.1061-JLADAH.LADR-1019.pdf (871.3Kb)
    Date
    2024/02/01
    Author
    Yi Lu
    Gayani Karunasena
    Chunlu Liu
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    Abstract
    Recent studies indicate that issues in compliance with building energy codes (BEC) are closely linked to practitioner’s varying compliance behavior, which jeopardizes BEC’s effectiveness and low-carbon target. Compliance usually means conforming to a rule, however what concerns BEC is going beyond minimal compliance. While building authorities introduce various interventions to promote practitioner’s compliance, magnitude of behavior changes from these interventions is unknown. In addition to this, variables from disciplinary-isolated compliance theories may generate a limited understanding concerning practitioner’s compliance behavior. Thus, this paper aims to conceptualize a cross-theoretical assessment model for building practitioner’s compliance behavior with BEC. This is achieved over two steps. First, an assessment for individual practitioner’s BEC compliance behavior is designed, integrating theory of planned behavior with compliance models from disciplines across criminology and psychology. This illustrates the variables that shape practitioner’s compliance behavior, and classifies the practitioner’s compliance behavioral states into: (1) not intended to go beyond minimal compliance, (2) intended but unsuccessful to go beyond minimal compliance, and (3) intended and successful to go beyond minimal compliance. Second, the model is expanded to aggregate-level by incorporating social influence theory. This enables a group-level time-dynamic assessment that considers interconnected practitioners’ interactions. This model thus demonstrates assessment mechanism of characterizing building practitioner’s emergent compliance behavior that results from inter-person interactions and regulatory interventions. Though this conceptual model is not yet empirically tested, it is designed based on well-established theories to ensure credibility. Eventually, this study informs authorities to formulate suitable and tailored interventions to promote compliance with BEC.
    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4297729
    Collections
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV
     

     

    Browse

    All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    View Usage Statistics

    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    Contact Us | Send Feedback
    Theme by 
    @mire NV