YaBeSH Engineering and Technology Library

    • Journals
    • PaperQuest
    • YSE Standards
    • YaBeSH
    • Login
    View Item 
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    • View Item
    •   YE&T Library
    • ASCE
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    • View Item
    • All Fields
    • Source Title
    • Year
    • Publisher
    • Title
    • Subject
    • Author
    • DOI
    • ISBN
    Advanced Search
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Archive

    Conceptual Cross-Theoretical Assessment Model for Practitioners’ Compliance Behavior with Building Energy Codes

    Source: Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2024:;Volume ( 016 ):;issue: 001::page 04523039-1
    Author:
    Yi Lu
    ,
    Gayani Karunasena
    ,
    Chunlu Liu
    DOI: 10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-1019
    Publisher: ASCE
    Abstract: Recent studies indicate that issues in compliance with building energy codes (BEC) are closely linked to practitioner’s varying compliance behavior, which jeopardizes BEC’s effectiveness and low-carbon target. Compliance usually means conforming to a rule, however what concerns BEC is going beyond minimal compliance. While building authorities introduce various interventions to promote practitioner’s compliance, magnitude of behavior changes from these interventions is unknown. In addition to this, variables from disciplinary-isolated compliance theories may generate a limited understanding concerning practitioner’s compliance behavior. Thus, this paper aims to conceptualize a cross-theoretical assessment model for building practitioner’s compliance behavior with BEC. This is achieved over two steps. First, an assessment for individual practitioner’s BEC compliance behavior is designed, integrating theory of planned behavior with compliance models from disciplines across criminology and psychology. This illustrates the variables that shape practitioner’s compliance behavior, and classifies the practitioner’s compliance behavioral states into: (1) not intended to go beyond minimal compliance, (2) intended but unsuccessful to go beyond minimal compliance, and (3) intended and successful to go beyond minimal compliance. Second, the model is expanded to aggregate-level by incorporating social influence theory. This enables a group-level time-dynamic assessment that considers interconnected practitioners’ interactions. This model thus demonstrates assessment mechanism of characterizing building practitioner’s emergent compliance behavior that results from inter-person interactions and regulatory interventions. Though this conceptual model is not yet empirically tested, it is designed based on well-established theories to ensure credibility. Eventually, this study informs authorities to formulate suitable and tailored interventions to promote compliance with BEC.
    • Download: (871.3Kb)
    • Show Full MetaData Hide Full MetaData
    • Get RIS
    • Item Order
    • Go To Publisher
    • Price: 5000 Rial
    • Statistics

      Conceptual Cross-Theoretical Assessment Model for Practitioners’ Compliance Behavior with Building Energy Codes

    URI
    http://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4297729
    Collections
    • Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction

    Show full item record

    contributor authorYi Lu
    contributor authorGayani Karunasena
    contributor authorChunlu Liu
    date accessioned2024-04-27T22:52:48Z
    date available2024-04-27T22:52:48Z
    date issued2024/02/01
    identifier other10.1061-JLADAH.LADR-1019.pdf
    identifier urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4297729
    description abstractRecent studies indicate that issues in compliance with building energy codes (BEC) are closely linked to practitioner’s varying compliance behavior, which jeopardizes BEC’s effectiveness and low-carbon target. Compliance usually means conforming to a rule, however what concerns BEC is going beyond minimal compliance. While building authorities introduce various interventions to promote practitioner’s compliance, magnitude of behavior changes from these interventions is unknown. In addition to this, variables from disciplinary-isolated compliance theories may generate a limited understanding concerning practitioner’s compliance behavior. Thus, this paper aims to conceptualize a cross-theoretical assessment model for building practitioner’s compliance behavior with BEC. This is achieved over two steps. First, an assessment for individual practitioner’s BEC compliance behavior is designed, integrating theory of planned behavior with compliance models from disciplines across criminology and psychology. This illustrates the variables that shape practitioner’s compliance behavior, and classifies the practitioner’s compliance behavioral states into: (1) not intended to go beyond minimal compliance, (2) intended but unsuccessful to go beyond minimal compliance, and (3) intended and successful to go beyond minimal compliance. Second, the model is expanded to aggregate-level by incorporating social influence theory. This enables a group-level time-dynamic assessment that considers interconnected practitioners’ interactions. This model thus demonstrates assessment mechanism of characterizing building practitioner’s emergent compliance behavior that results from inter-person interactions and regulatory interventions. Though this conceptual model is not yet empirically tested, it is designed based on well-established theories to ensure credibility. Eventually, this study informs authorities to formulate suitable and tailored interventions to promote compliance with BEC.
    publisherASCE
    titleConceptual Cross-Theoretical Assessment Model for Practitioners’ Compliance Behavior with Building Energy Codes
    typeJournal Article
    journal volume16
    journal issue1
    journal titleJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction
    identifier doi10.1061/JLADAH.LADR-1019
    journal fristpage04523039-1
    journal lastpage04523039-12
    page12
    treeJournal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction:;2024:;Volume ( 016 ):;issue: 001
    contenttypeFulltext
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian
     
    DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
    نرم افزار کتابخانه دیجیتال "دی اسپیس" فارسی شده توسط یابش برای کتابخانه های ایرانی | تماس با یابش
    yabeshDSpacePersian