Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAshit Harode
dc.contributor.authorWalid Thabet
dc.contributor.authorXinghua Gao
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-27T22:43:14Z
dc.date.available2024-04-27T22:43:14Z
dc.date.issued2024/03/01
dc.identifier.other10.1061-JCCEE5.CPENG-5548.pdf
dc.identifier.urihttp://yetl.yabesh.ir/yetl1/handle/yetl/4297334
dc.description.abstractEven with the utilization of software tools like Navisworks to automate clash detection, clash resolution in construction projects remains a slow and manual process. The reason is the meticulous nature of the process where coordinators need to ensure that resolving one clash does not lead to new clashes. The use of machine learning to automate clash resolution as a potential option to improve the clash resolution process has been suggested with research showing positive results to support the implementation. While the research shows high accuracy in predicting clash resolution options to support automation, the scope limits the discussion on the complex and often lengthy process of developing a machine-learning model. Based on this research gap, the authors in this paper discuss the development of a prediction model to identify clash resolution options for given clashes. The discussion is focused on individual steps involved in creating machine-learning models like data collection, data preprocessing, and machine-learning algorithm development and selection. The authors also address common challenges in the development of machine-learning models including class imbalance and availability of limited data. The authors utilize a multilabel synthetic oversampling method to generate different percentages of synthetic data to account for class imbalance and limited data sets. Using this data set, the authors trained five machine-learning algorithms and reported on their accuracy. The authors concluded that increasing the data set with 20% synthetic data, and using an artificial neural network to develop the machine-learning model to automate the resolution of clashes have generated better results with an average accuracy of around 80%.
dc.publisherASCE
dc.titleDeveloping a Machine-Learning Model to Predict Clash Resolution Options
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.journal.volume38
dc.journal.issue2
dc.journal.titleJournal of Computing in Civil Engineering
dc.identifier.doi10.1061/JCCEE5.CPENG-5548
dc.journal.fristpage04024005-1
dc.journal.lastpage04024005-18
dc.page18
dc.treeJournal of Computing in Civil Engineering:;2024:;Volume ( 038 ):;issue: 002
dc.contenttypeFulltext


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record